Update dependencies

[rohanbabbar04]

Description

• Remove fixed dependencies from requirements.(Would be better for future versions of python).

Checklist

• Code style is correct (follows ruff and black guidelines)
• All Tests pass

[rohanbabbar04]

• I think we should get rid of the fixed dependencies (==) which will make it easier to migrate to python3.13.
• Don't really know why this error is coming(could be due to some minor adjustments in random values)

[aloctavodia]

We can get small differences like this due to changes from one scipy version to the other.
Dependencies can be tricky. If we leave them unfixed, users may get errors or missing features on new installations just because a dependency got updated, but untested on our side. We should probably stick to this https://scientific-python.org/specs/spec-0000/

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.27%. Comparing base (f25da81) to head (1aaf9f9).
Report is 94 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (f25da81) and HEAD (1aaf9f9). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (f25da81)	HEAD (1aaf9f9)
	3	2

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #637      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.23%   74.27%   -7.96%     
==========================================
  Files         101      105       +4     
  Lines        8020     8709     +689     
==========================================
- Hits         6595     6469     -126     
- Misses       1425     2240     +815     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rohanbabbar04]

We can get small differences like this due to changes from one scipy version to the other. Dependencies can be tricky. If we leave them unfixed, users may get errors or missing features on new installations just because a dependency got updated, but untested on our side. We should probably stick to this https://scientific-python.org/specs/spec-0000/

Yup, I have updated to scipy>=1.10, <1.15 which seems to be good, our tests work fine as well.
I went through the release notes of scipy they seem to have support for python3.13 in release version > 1.14

[rohanbabbar04]

@aloctavodia, this is ready to be reviewed.
With this it should be possible to incorporate python3.13 without much fuss :)