Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite location config tests using tables #855

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

sevein
Copy link
Contributor

@sevein sevein commented Feb 6, 2024

This pull request rewrites the location config tests using tables and subtests. It does not introduce functional changes.

It depends on #854.

@Diogenesoftoronto
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good I was considering doing this once I saw what location configuration test was like in #842.

Base automatically changed from dev/issue-853-return-error-when-multiple-config to main February 8, 2024 11:51
@sevein sevein force-pushed the dev/issue-853-location-config-subtests branch from 5710411 to cd3a5c6 Compare February 8, 2024 11:58
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f75db1b) 45.16% compared to head (cd3a5c6) 45.26%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #855      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   45.16%   45.26%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          93       93              
  Lines        5039     5039              
==========================================
+ Hits         2276     2281       +5     
+ Misses       2561     2555       -6     
- Partials      202      203       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sevein sevein merged commit 3c851dd into main Feb 8, 2024
13 checks passed
@sevein sevein deleted the dev/issue-853-location-config-subtests branch February 8, 2024 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants