Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add vulnerability type #174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2023
Merged

add vulnerability type #174

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2023

Conversation

refaelm92
Copy link
Contributor

@refaelm92 refaelm92 commented Nov 16, 2023

PR Type:

Enhancement


PR Description:

This PR introduces a new type, Vulnerability, to the armotypes package. The Vulnerability type includes the following fields:

  • Name
  • Severity
  • SeverityScore
  • IsRCE
  • Links
  • Description

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:
  • armotypes/vulnerabilitytypes.go: Added a new type Vulnerability with fields for name, severity, severity score, whether it's a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability, links, and a description.

User Description:

Signed-off-by: refaelm [email protected]

Signed-off-by: refaelm <[email protected]>
@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 16, 2023
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Adding a new Vulnerability type to the armotypes package
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces a new type, Vulnerability, to the armotypes package. The Vulnerability type includes fields for name, severity, severity score, whether it's a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability, links, and a description.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the PR is straightforward and only introduces a new type with no complex logic involved.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR is generally well-structured and the new type is well-defined. However, it would be beneficial to include tests to ensure the new type works as expected.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: armotypes/vulnerabilitytypes.go
      suggestion: Consider adding validation for the Severity field. It should only accept known severity levels. [important]
      relevant line: Severity string json:"severity"

    • relevant file: armotypes/vulnerabilitytypes.go
      suggestion: Consider adding a constructor for the Vulnerability type. This can ensure that all required fields are set and can provide a more controlled way of creating a Vulnerability instance. [medium]
      relevant line: type Vulnerability struct {

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@refaelm92 refaelm92 merged commit 6f33890 into main Nov 19, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants