Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
plain text math to latex
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
jbae11 committed Aug 2, 2017
1 parent 107e525 commit aa308f0
Showing 1 changed file with 72 additions and 30 deletions.
102 changes: 72 additions & 30 deletions scenario_specifcation.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
## Assumption, Parameters, Models and References:

1. The compositions, core mass and reactor ratio is referenced from [appendix B of E&S study](https://fuelcycleevaluation.inl.gov/Shared%20Documents/ES%20Appendix%20B.pdf).
1. The compositions, core mass and reactor ratio are obtained from [appendix B of E&S study](https://fuelcycleevaluation.inl.gov/Shared%20Documents/ES%20Appendix%20B.pdf).

2. The assumptions of net installed power increase and advanced technology availability is referenced from [FCO study](https://github.com/arfc/transition-scenarios/files/796778/5061-.final.pdf).
2. The assumptions of net installed power increase and advanced technology availability are obtained from [FCO study](https://github.com/arfc/transition-scenarios/files/796778/5061-.final.pdf).

3. `CYCAMORE::REACTOR`, the recipe reactor, was used for the reactor archetype.

Expand All @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@

7. For SFRs, blanket and driver are averaged into one 'core' (added mass with weighted composition).

## GAPS:
## Gaps:

1. Recipe Reactor Limitations:
* Can't match with Burnup, needs recipe (always same composition out)
Expand All @@ -34,23 +34,32 @@
5. EG29, 30 reprocessed material only goes in one mixer if both mixer has infinite throughput / buffer.

6. Throughput should be adjusted according to fuel demand, in order for the distribution
of fissile commodity (rep U, TRU, PU) among different fuel fab facilities. (inf throughput
-> one facility gets all fissile commodity)
of fissile commodity (rep U, TRU, PU) among different fuel fab facilities.
( If two facilities with infinite throughput (demand of commodity A) exists, one facility gets all
the commodity A and the other none. Also, When given a situation where multiple demands cannot be met,
the agent with a higher demand quantity is preferred.)



## FROM APPENDIX B OF FUELCYCLEEVALUATION.INL.GOV
## From Appendix B of Fuelcycleevaluation.inl.gov
### EG23
Continuous recycle of Pu/U in SFR:

| Category | Driver| Blanket |
| :-------------: |:-------------:| -----:|
| Material | Pu / Rep U | Nat U |
| Burnup | 81.5 Gwd/t | 23.5 Gwd/t |
| Composition |15.3 % Pu | .7% U235 |
| Fuel Residence Time | 3.6 years (avg) |
| Normalized % |91.21% | 8.79 % |

$
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption {EG23 - Continuous Recycle of Pu/U in SFR:}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
\hline
Category & Driver & Blanket \\ \hline
Material & Pu / Rep U & Nat U \\ \hline
Burnup & 81.5 Gwd/t & 23.5 Gwd/t \\ \hline
Composition & 15.3 \% Pu & 0.7\% U235 \\ \hline
Fuel Residence Time & 3.6 years (avg) & 3.6 years (avg) \\ \hline
Normalized \% & 91.21\% & 8.79\% \\ \hline

\end{tabular}
\end {table}
$
For 100 GW-year (250 FR-year), uses 1,257,400 kg of fuel
-> 1 FR spends 1,257,400/250 * (14/12) = **5867 kg / Batch**

Expand All @@ -62,14 +71,22 @@ Refueling time: 1 month
### EG24
Continuous recycle of TRU/U in SFR:

$
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption {EG24 - Continuous Recycle of TRU/U in SFR:}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline
Category & Driver \\ \hline
Material & TRU / Rep U \\ \hline
Burnup & 73 Gwd/t \\ \hline
Composition & 13.9 \% TRU \\ \hline
Fuel Residence Time & 3.6 years \\ \hline

\end{tabular}
\end {table}
$


| Category | Driver|
| :-------------: |:-------------:|
| Material | TRU / Rep U / Nat U |
| Burnup | 73 Gwd/t |
| Composition | 13.9% TRU |
| Fuel Residence Time | 3.6 years |


For 100 GW-year (250 FR-year), uses 1,251,200 kg of fuel
Expand All @@ -82,14 +99,22 @@ Refueling time: 1 month
### EG29
Pu/U produced in SFR used to operate PWR in continuous recycle strategy:


| Category | Driver| Blanket | MOX |
| :------------- |:-------------:| :-----:| :-----:|
| Material | Pu / Rep U / Nat U | Rep U / Nat U | Pu / Rep U |
| Burnup | 96.8 Gwd/t | 20.7 Gwd/t | 50 GWd/t |
| Composition | 21.4 % Pu | ~.2 % U235 | 9.11% Pu |
| Fuel Residence Time | 5 years (avg) | 3.9 years |
| Normalized % | 33.3 % | 66.7 % | 100% |
$
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption {EG29 - Pu/U produced in SFR used to operate PWR in continuous recycle strategy:}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Category & Driver & Blanket & MOX \\ \hline
Material & Pu / Rep U / Nat U & Rep U / Nat U & Pu / Rep U \\ \hline
Burnup & 96.8 Gwd/t & 20.7 Gwd/t & 50 GWd/t \\ \hline
Composition & 21.4 \% Pu & ~.2\% U235 & 9.11\% Pu \\ \hline
Fuel Residence Time & 5 years (avg) & 5 years (avg) & 3.9 years \\ \hline
Normalized \% & 33.3\% & 66.7\% & 100\% \\ \hline

\end{tabular}
\end {table}
$

**FR:**
For 61.08 GW-year (152 FR-year), uses 1,206,900 kg of fuel
Expand All @@ -108,6 +133,23 @@ Refueling time: 1 month
### EG30
TRU/U produced in SFR used to operate PWR in continuous recycle strategy:

$
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption {EG30 - TRU/U produced in SFR used to operate PWR in continuous recycle strategy:}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Category & Driver & Blanket & MOX \\ \hline
Material & TRU / Rep U / Nat U & Rep U / Nat U & TRU / Rep U \\ \hline
Burnup & 107 Gwd/t & 23 Gwd/t & 50 GWd/t \\ \hline
Composition & 24.4 \% TRU & .15\% U235 & 10.4 \% TRU \\ \hline
Fuel Residence Time & 4.9 years (avg) & 4.9 years (avg) & 3.9 years \\ \hline
Normalized \% & 47\% & 53\% & 100\% \\ \hline

\end{tabular}
\end {table}
$

| Category | Driver| Blanket | MOX |
| :-------------: |:-------------:| :-----:| :-----:|
| Material | TRU / Rep U / Nat U | Rep U / Nat U | TRU / Rep U |
Expand Down

0 comments on commit aa308f0

Please sign in to comment.