-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 577
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor and improve list of available blocks #2513
Open
Tofandel
wants to merge
20
commits into
area17:3.x
Choose a base branch
from
Tofandel:feat/exclude-callback
base: 3.x
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
64f68a2
Refactor block list
Tofandel 4c04072
Add global order config
Tofandel 38d419f
Only output list of used blocks
Tofandel 1c03b17
Fix some blocks are missing
Tofandel dff7cdc
Fix repeater templates are missing
Tofandel 71e3474
Revert changes
Tofandel baff1d4
Fix nested blocks are not rendered
Tofandel 11697ac
Fix nested blocks are not rendered
Tofandel a5fb2ec
Allow function in blocks()
Tofandel 186ce64
Fix globally excluded blocks
Tofandel 1cf7c7e
Merge branch '3.x' into feat/exclude-callback
ifox 4713146
Fix error
Tofandel deaf397
Laravel 11 support
Tofandel 1e10d29
Fix missing block in test
Tofandel 1f862e0
Flush cache
Tofandel 0910352
Fix block name
Tofandel 47d5fdc
Revert useless use
Tofandel d8bb096
Merge branch '3.x' into feat/exclude-callback
Tofandel 1b0481f
Merge branch '3.x' into feat/exclude-callback
ifox dd5369b
Merge branch '3.x' into feat/exclude-callback
ifox File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is meant for a different PR, but if you're okay with it we can leave it in direclty as well, I was just chasing bugs and I stumbled accross
!in_array($fieldRules, $fieldRules->toArray())
which is very weird and also always trueThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This used to be a check against
'nullable'
, see 315082b#diff-0408ed612a5dd9175dea4ee82126a50940e6809907eae490aa1abf94e10a9986R94 and it looks like it was wrongly replaced during another change.I'm fine with keeping this in this PR.