-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added missing virtual destructors #218
Open
andreagilardoni
wants to merge
1
commit into
arduino:master
Choose a base branch
from
andreagilardoni:virtual-destructors
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you think that
String
warrants avirtual
destructor? Is there anyvirtual
function in the class? On a quick glance I could not find one.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This question answer is as simple as understanding if we want to allow the user to extend the
arduino::String
classThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Undefined behaviour is related to having any virtual function, not to inheritance.
So currently, we do need to add a virtual destructor to
Print
because it has a virtual functions.Thus, a virtual destructor is not currently a necessity for
String
. I can inherit fromString
, ex.MyString
and useMyString
all along my code, without any undefined behaviour.However, you might want to add a virtual destructor to
String
because you expect users to add virtual functions to theirMyString
. But that's more about securing the code about expected usages than fixing the current code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can have memory leaks if in
MyString
class I allocate something that needs to be deleted, I create a proper destructor, I reference it with a pointer toString
then I delete it, the derived class destructor is not called.The answer, in my opinion, is not strictly limited to "
String
doesn't have virtual methods", because I could want some features ofString
class and extend them with my custom features. I think you can implement a solution in other better ways, like by embeddingString
instead. Thus my question: do we want to allow the user to extendString
class?