consolidate move struct and resource type

[0xmigo]

Description

resolve #117

Removing the MoveStructType and consolidate into MoveResourceType.

We could keep both, and assign one to another. i.e

export type MoveStructType = MoveResourceType;
export type MoveResourceType = `${string}::${string}::${string}`;

But I feel like it would just confuse the user.

Test Plan

pnpm fmt

Related Links

[xbtmatt]

I think MoveStructType makes more sense if we have to use one (because function names aren't MoveResources technically), but honestly the type alias solution might be the most accurate. Maybe there's a more formal name for the 1::2::3 type format in the Move book that encompasses function names and structs/resources

[0xmigo]

@xbtmatt Yeah I was thinking about using a alias option that I mentioned in the description. Not sure if that will confuse the user though.

[0xmaayan]

@xbtmatt Yeah I was thinking about using a alias option that I mentioned in the description. Not sure if that will confuse the user though.

Let's not use alias, that only creates confusion. We should go with a type name that makes sense to us

[0xmigo]

@xbtmatt Description will live here. Updating to name MoveStructType

[xbtmatt]

I think we should say something like...

/**
* This is the format for a fully qualified struct, resource, or entry function in Move.
*/

Above it or something