Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add more tests for higher test coverage #678

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

yuunlimm
Copy link
Contributor

@yuunlimm yuunlimm commented Jan 16, 2025

Description

add test cases for higher coverage

Test Plan

ran tests locally.

Copy link
Contributor Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 48.7%. Comparing base (0c92d32) to head (c586b47).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main    #678     +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   47.6%   48.7%   +1.1%     
=======================================
  Files        242     242             
  Lines      27795   27851     +56     
=======================================
+ Hits       13233   13589    +356     
+ Misses     14562   14262    -300     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yuunlimm yuunlimm force-pushed the 01-16-add_more_tests_for_higher_test_coverage branch from ec69929 to c586b47 Compare January 16, 2025 22:36
@yuunlimm yuunlimm marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2025 22:47
@yuunlimm yuunlimm merged commit 2e694f1 into main Jan 17, 2025
11 checks passed
@yuunlimm yuunlimm deleted the 01-16-add_more_tests_for_higher_test_coverage branch January 17, 2025 00:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants