Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Consensus Observer] Fix new pipeline. #15803

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

JoshLind
Copy link
Contributor

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Key Areas to Review

Type of Change

  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • Breaking change
  • Performance improvement
  • Refactoring
  • Dependency update
  • Documentation update
  • Tests

Which Components or Systems Does This Change Impact?

  • Validator Node
  • Full Node (API, Indexer, etc.)
  • Move/Aptos Virtual Machine
  • Aptos Framework
  • Aptos CLI/SDK
  • Developer Infrastructure
  • Move Compiler
  • Other (specify)

Checklist

  • I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I identified and added all stakeholders and component owners affected by this change as reviewers
  • I tested both happy and unhappy path of the functionality
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

Copy link

trunk-io bot commented Jan 23, 2025

⏱️ 3h 13m total CI duration on this PR
Slowest 15 Jobs Cumulative Duration Recent Runs
execution-performance / single-node-performance 1h 12m 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
execution-performance / test-target-determinator 27m 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
test-target-determinator 24m 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
check-dynamic-deps 18m 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 (+1 more)
rust-cargo-deny 8m 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
fetch-last-released-docker-image-tag 8m 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
rust-doc-tests 7m 🟩
rust-doc-tests 5m 🟩
rust-doc-tests 5m 🟩
rust-doc-tests 5m 🟩
rust-doc-tests 5m 🟩
semgrep/ci 3m 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 (+1 more)
general-lints 2m 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
file_change_determinator 57s 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
file_change_determinator 47s 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 (+1 more)

🚨 1 job on the last run was significantly faster/slower than expected

Job Duration vs 7d avg Delta
execution-performance / single-node-performance 25m 16m +56%

settingsfeedbackdocs ⋅ learn more about trunk.io

@JoshLind JoshLind added the CICD:run-e2e-tests when this label is present github actions will run all land-blocking e2e tests from the PR label Jan 23, 2025
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ impl Tracker {
.with_label_values(&[self.name, "work_time"])
.observe(work_time.as_secs_f64());
info!(
"[Pipeline] Block {} {} {} finishes {}, waits {}, takes {}",
"[Pipeline] Block {} {} {} finishes {}, waits {}ms, takes {}ms",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The log message appends ms to the time values but as_secs_f64() returns seconds. To avoid misleading logs, either convert the values to milliseconds (multiply by 1000) before logging, or remove the ms suffix to reflect the actual units in seconds.

Spotted by Graphite Reviewer

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Forge suite realistic_env_max_load success on 455a26a3110d3a038da8d26082cd4b091328910a

two traffics test: inner traffic : committed: 14735.66 txn/s, submitted: 14735.71 txn/s, expired: 0.05 txn/s, latency: 2698.03 ms, (p50: 2400 ms, p70: 2400, p90: 2700 ms, p99: 9000 ms), latency samples: 5602840
two traffics test : committed: 100.00 txn/s, latency: 1867.58 ms, (p50: 1400 ms, p70: 1400, p90: 3000 ms, p99: 10000 ms), latency samples: 1780
Latency breakdown for phase 0: ["MempoolToBlockCreation: max: 1.324, avg: 1.041", "ConsensusProposalToOrdered: max: 0.292, avg: 0.290", "ConsensusOrderedToCommit: max: 0.427, avg: 0.410", "ConsensusProposalToCommit: max: 0.717, avg: 0.700"]
Max non-epoch-change gap was: 0 rounds at version 0 (avg 0.00) [limit 4], 1.21s no progress at version 25853 (avg 0.19s) [limit 15].
Max epoch-change gap was: 0 rounds at version 0 (avg 0.00) [limit 4], 0.78s no progress at version 2311458 (avg 0.78s) [limit 16].
Test Ok

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Forge suite compat success on cb5d7c9615b937357dbede9439401be640fb7d17 ==> 455a26a3110d3a038da8d26082cd4b091328910a

Compatibility test results for cb5d7c9615b937357dbede9439401be640fb7d17 ==> 455a26a3110d3a038da8d26082cd4b091328910a (PR)
1. Check liveness of validators at old version: cb5d7c9615b937357dbede9439401be640fb7d17
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::liveness-check : committed: 5173.35 txn/s, submitted: 5173.52 txn/s, expired: 0.17 txn/s, latency: 3026.17 ms, (p50: 2600 ms, p70: 2900, p90: 4800 ms, p99: 11000 ms), latency samples: 341949
2. Upgrading first Validator to new version: 455a26a3110d3a038da8d26082cd4b091328910a
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::single-validator-upgrading : committed: 4094.01 txn/s, latency: 7637.80 ms, (p50: 8400 ms, p70: 9000, p90: 9400 ms, p99: 9600 ms), latency samples: 90100
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::single-validator-upgrade : committed: 4096.03 txn/s, latency: 8324.68 ms, (p50: 9400 ms, p70: 9400, p90: 9700 ms, p99: 9700 ms), latency samples: 143760
3. Upgrading rest of first batch to new version: 455a26a3110d3a038da8d26082cd4b091328910a
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::half-validator-upgrading : committed: 4232.30 txn/s, latency: 7348.77 ms, (p50: 8100 ms, p70: 8800, p90: 9200 ms, p99: 9300 ms), latency samples: 91340
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::half-validator-upgrade : committed: 4228.95 txn/s, latency: 8046.52 ms, (p50: 9000 ms, p70: 9100, p90: 9400 ms, p99: 9500 ms), latency samples: 148320
4. upgrading second batch to new version: 455a26a3110d3a038da8d26082cd4b091328910a
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::rest-validator-upgrading : committed: 1798.76 txn/s, submitted: 1798.91 txn/s, expired: 0.15 txn/s, latency: 4418.07 ms, (p50: 4500 ms, p70: 4800, p90: 6700 ms, p99: 6800 ms), latency samples: 130249
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::rest-validator-upgrade : committed: 7291.87 txn/s, latency: 4705.28 ms, (p50: 4700 ms, p70: 5500, p90: 6000 ms, p99: 6100 ms), latency samples: 246640
5. check swarm health
Compatibility test for cb5d7c9615b937357dbede9439401be640fb7d17 ==> 455a26a3110d3a038da8d26082cd4b091328910a passed
Test Ok

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CICD:run-e2e-tests when this label is present github actions will run all land-blocking e2e tests from the PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant