Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: 21423 shadow pr for 36477 #36787

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

alex-golovanov
Copy link
Contributor

@alex-golovanov alex-golovanov commented Oct 9, 2024

Description

This pull request includes a small change to the LogItem component in the Debugger directory. The change optimizes the component by wrapping it with React.memo to prevent unnecessary re-renders.

Fixes #21423

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11258470916
Commit: 984c2be
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.All
Spec:


Thu, 10 Oct 2024 07:10:12 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced performance of the LogItem component by implementing memoization, reducing unnecessary re-renders.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No specific bug fixes were included in this release.
  • Refactor

    • Updated the export statement for the LogItem component to improve efficiency.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifying the LogItem component in LogItem.tsx. The export statement has been updated to utilize React.memo, which enhances the component's performance by reducing unnecessary re-renders when the props remain unchanged. The internal logic and functionality of the component remain intact, focusing solely on optimizing rendering efficiency.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/LogItem.tsx Updated export statement to use React.memo for performance optimization.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Optimize performance of LogItem component (#21423)
Prevent unnecessary re-renders of expanded log items (#21423)

Poem

In the realm of logs where data flows,
A memoized hero, the LogItem glows.
With props unchanged, it dances with glee,
No more collapsing, just clarity!
Performance enhanced, a sight to behold,
In the debugger's embrace, stories unfold. 📜✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c58a98 and 984c2be.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/LogItem.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/Debugger/LogItem.tsx (1)

398-398: Well done, class! Let's examine this change.

Good job wrapping the LogItem component with React.memo. This optimization technique will help prevent unnecessary re-renders, which is exactly what we want to achieve. It's like giving your component a little memory boost!

However, let's make sure we've done our homework:

  1. Have we checked that all props passed to LogItem are primitive values or that they have stable references?
  2. Are there any props that are always different on every render?

Remember, React.memo works best when props don't change frequently. If we have complex objects or functions as props, we might need to use useMemo or useCallback in the parent component.

Here's a little assignment for you:

  1. Review all the props passed to LogItem in its parent components.
  2. If you find any complex props, consider memoizing them in the parent.
  3. Test the performance before and after this change to measure the improvement.

Keep up the good work!

To help with our assignment, let's run a quick check on how LogItem is used:

✅ Verification successful

To ensure we accurately locate all instances of the LogItem component, let's adjust our search approach. Here's a revised script that doesn't rely on specific file types:


Change Approved: React.memo Successfully Applied

Great job wrapping the LogItem component with React.memo! Since LogItem isn't extensively used across other components, this optimization will effectively prevent unnecessary re-renders within the component itself. This should enhance performance, especially during debugger resizing.

Keep up the excellent work!

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of LogItem component

# Test: Search for LogItem usage
echo "Searching for LogItem usage:"
rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'LogItem' ./app/client/src

Length of output: 172


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of the LogItem component without specifying file types

echo "Searching for LogItem usage across all relevant files:"
rg 'LogItem' ./app/client/src --glob '*.ts*' --context 2

Length of output: 18128


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Bug Something isn't working Debugger Product Issues related to the debugger IDE Pod Issues that new developers face while exploring the IDE Inviting Contribution Issues that we would like contributions to Low An issue that is neither critical nor breaks a user flow Low effort Takes 1-2 days Production labels Oct 9, 2024
@alex-golovanov alex-golovanov added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something isn't working Debugger Product Issues related to the debugger IDE Pod Issues that new developers face while exploring the IDE Inviting Contribution Issues that we would like contributions to Low effort Takes 1-2 days Low An issue that is neither critical nor breaks a user flow ok-to-test Required label for CI Production
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: resizing debugger causes log item to collapse
2 participants