Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: ast mono repo poc #15610

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 11, 2022
Merged

feat: ast mono repo poc #15610

merged 9 commits into from
Aug 11, 2022

Conversation

AmanAgarwal041
Copy link
Contributor

@AmanAgarwal041 AmanAgarwal041 commented Aug 2, 2022

POC for Shared AST Logic using Yarn Symlinks

We have added Shared Module Readme to specify the steps to add a shared module, install a shared module in any application within our repo or verify the installation of shared module in any application.

Fixes #15361

Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions, so we can reproduce.
Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.

  • Test A
  • Test B

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 2, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
appsmith ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Aug 8, 2022 at 10:39AM (UTC)

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 2, 2022

Deployment failed with the following error:

Resource is limited - try again in 18 minutes (more than 100, code: "api-deployments-free-per-day").

@github-actions github-actions bot added Query & JS Pod Issues related to the query & JS Pod Datasources Issues related to configuring datasource on appsmith Frontend This label marks the issue or pull request to reference client code High This issue blocks a user from building or impacts a lot of users Task A simple Todo labels Aug 2, 2022
@Irongade
Copy link
Contributor

Irongade commented Aug 4, 2022

/ok-to-test sha=41efd88

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2022

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/2795905469.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Commit: 41efd88.
PR: 15610.

@Irongade
Copy link
Contributor

Irongade commented Aug 5, 2022

/ok-to-test sha=b27a7c6

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2022

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/2804526808.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Commit: b27a7c6.
PR: 15610.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2022

UI Performance test run logs and artifacts: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/2804526808.
Commit: b27a7c6.
Results:

Click to view performance test results

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Median Mean SD.Sample SD.Population
SELECT_WIDGET_MENU_OPEN
scripting 1102.28 1142.48 1106.99 1220.45 1175.19 1142.48 1149.48 4.30 3.85
painting 6.61 15.74 7.82 10.5 16.06 10.5 11.35 38.68 34.63
rendering 858.2 873.9 890.13 941.25 921.74 890.13 897.04 3.80 3.40
SELECT_WIDGET_SELECT_OPTION
scripting 157.6 166.08 168.83 168.36 163.87 166.08 164.95 2.76 2.47
painting 6.65 2.92 7.95 3.68 4.57 4.57 5.15 40.78 36.31
rendering 312.49 308.92 327.65 325.85 316.6 316.6 318.3 2.58 2.31

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Enhancement New feature or request label Aug 8, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2022

Unable to find test scripts. Please add necessary tests to the PR.

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2022

Unable to find test scripts. Please add necessary tests to the PR.

@AmanAgarwal041
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok-to-test sha=9c67967

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2022

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/2817322970.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Commit: 9c67967.
PR: 15610.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2022

UI Performance test run logs and artifacts: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/2817322970.
Commit: 9c67967.
Results:

Click to view performance test results

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Median Mean SD.Sample SD.Population
SELECT_WIDGET_MENU_OPEN
scripting 1203.82 1111.48 1061.07 1127.82 1060.05 1111.48 1112.85 5.31 4.75
painting 14.52 5.16 4.66 7.41 9.82 7.41 8.31 48.50 43.32
rendering 873.82 843.25 823.57 860.47 825.86 843.25 845.39 2.58 2.30
SELECT_WIDGET_SELECT_OPTION
scripting 167.75 170.48 153.81 168 161.9 167.75 164.39 4.08 3.64
painting 5.07 4.65 2.36 3.2 5.35 4.65 4.13 31.23 27.85
rendering 318.82 306.02 303.16 291.14 297.77 303.16 303.38 3.40 3.05

@Aishwarya-U-R Aishwarya-U-R added the Test Plan Approved Manual/Cypress tests covers changes made on the PR. Else, add skip-testPlan label if not applicable label Aug 11, 2022
@Aishwarya-U-R
Copy link
Contributor

Adding 'Test Plan Approved' since this PR is a poc & regression run is suffice as per discussion with @AmanAgarwal041 too.

@AmanAgarwal041 AmanAgarwal041 merged commit 3b00508 into release Aug 11, 2022
@AmanAgarwal041 AmanAgarwal041 deleted the feat/ast branch August 11, 2022 15:29
@Nikhil-Nandagopal Nikhil-Nandagopal added the Javascript Product Issues related to users writing javascript in appsmith label Aug 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Nikhil-Nandagopal has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 901749d and 9c67967.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AST-frontend Issues related to maintaining AST logic Datasources Issues related to configuring datasource on appsmith Enhancement New feature or request Frontend This label marks the issue or pull request to reference client code High This issue blocks a user from building or impacts a lot of users Javascript Product Issues related to users writing javascript in appsmith Query & JS Pod Issues related to the query & JS Pod Task A simple Todo Test Plan Approved Manual/Cypress tests covers changes made on the PR. Else, add skip-testPlan label if not applicable
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Task]: POC for Monorepo Management System
5 participants