Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add clojure/lacinia #813

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

dball
Copy link

@dball dball commented Jun 14, 2021

Note I am not the maintainer, but I have happily used it in the past and observe that it now supports Apollo federation.

Note I am not the maintainer, but I have happily used it in the past and observe that it now supports Apollo federation.
@apollo-cla
Copy link

@dball: Thank you for submitting a pull request! Before we can merge it, you'll need to sign the Apollo Contributor License Agreement here: https://contribute.apollographql.com/

@michael-watson
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @dball 👋 , thanks for this! I'm actually actively working on a revamp of this section of the docs that will give a better understanding of what exactly is supported in each of these libraries. Much more to come on this in the near future and I'm going to add this library to the list of what I'll be testing.

@michael-watson
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @dball, I have some progress updates from my last comment that I wanted to follow up on. I recently put up a community post around the strategy for testing subgraph implementations for compatibility with the spec.

Subgraph implementations can be added to the repo, we have an implementation guide for anyone to contribute back to the repo. Today I merged our first community contribution for caliban.

And I just saw the issue you opened, thank you! we'll close this PR out and use that issue instead: apollographql/apollo-federation-subgraph-compatibility#28

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants