Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IJ/AS plugin] Add options to ignore fields when reporting unused fields #5197

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 21, 2023

Conversation

BoD
Copy link
Contributor

@BoD BoD commented Aug 18, 2023

Screen.Recording.2023-08-18.at.17.44.56.mov

Related #5172

@BoD BoD requested a review from martinbonnin as a code owner August 18, 2023 15:49
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 18, 2023

Deploy Preview for apollo-android-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a78a6d2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/apollo-android-docs/deploys/64e33af5f5bd3d00088a14b7

@sonatard
Copy link
Contributor

sonatard commented Aug 21, 2023

Hi! Is it possible to share this setting as a config file with the team?

@BoD
Copy link
Contributor Author

BoD commented Aug 21, 2023

Hi! Is it possible to share this setting as a config file with the team?

Hi @sonatard yes if your inspections profile is set to the project (I think it's the default), then this will automatically be saved in .idea/inspectionProfiles/ which you can keep in git so everybody on the project has the same. This can also be done one-time by exporting/importing inspection profiles from the settings.

@sonatard
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your work!

@BoD BoD marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2023 07:38
@BoD BoD marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2023 10:23
@BoD BoD merged commit eeba31e into main Aug 21, 2023
8 checks passed
@BoD BoD deleted the ij-plugin-ignore-unused-fields branch August 21, 2023 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants