Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document the clustering #302

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 18, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions CHANGES.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Release Notes.

- List all properties in a group.
- Implement Write-ahead Logging
- Document the clustering.

### Bugs

Expand Down
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ The database research community usually uses [RUM conjecture](http://daslab.seas
### Distributed manager (v1.0.0)

- [ ] Sharding
- [ ] Replication and consistency model
- [ ] Load balance
- [ ] Distributed query optimizer
- [ ] Node discovery
Expand Down
184 changes: 184 additions & 0 deletions docs/concept/clustering.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
# BanyanDB Clustering

BanyanDB Clustering introduces a robust and scalable architecture that comprises "Query Nodes", "Liaison Nodes", "Data Nodes", and "Meta Nodes". This structure allows for effectively distributing and managing time-series data within the system.

## 1. Architectural Overview

A BanyanDB installation includes four distinct types of nodes: Data Nodes, Meta Nodes, Query Nodes, and Liaison Nodes.

![clustering](https://skywalking.apache.org/doc-graph/banyandb/v0.5.0/clustring.png)

### 1.1 Data Nodes

Data Nodes hold all the raw time series data, metadata, and indexed data. They handle the storage and management of data, including streams and measures, tag keys and values, as well as field keys and values.

In addition to persistent raw data, Data Nodes also handle TopN aggregation calculation or other computational tasks.
hanahmily marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

### 1.2 Meta Nodes

Meta Nodes are responsible for maintaining high-level metadata of the cluster, which includes:

- All nodes in the cluster
- All database schemas

### 1.3 Query Nodes

Query Nodes are responsible for handling computational tasks associated with querying the database. They build query tasks and search for data from Data Nodes.

### 1.4 Liaison Nodes

Liaison Nodes serve as gateways, routing traffic to Query Nodes and Data Nodes. In addition to routing, they also provide authentication, TTL, and other security services to ensure secure and effective communication without the cluster.

### 1.5 Standalone Mode

BanyanDB integrates multiple roles into a single process in the standalone mode, making it simpler and faster to deploy. This mode is especially useful for scenarios with a limited number of data points or for testing and development purposes.

In this mode, the single process performs the roles of the Liaison Node, Query Node, Data Node, and Meta Node. It receives requests, maintains metadata, processes queries, and handles data, all within a unified setup.

## 2. Communication within a Cluster

All nodes within a BanyanDB cluster communicate with other nodes according to their roles:

- Meta Nodes share high-level metadata about the cluster.
- Data Nodes store and manage the raw time series data and communicate with Meta Nodes.
- Query Nodes interact with Data Nodes to execute queries and return results to the Liaison Nodes.
- Liaison Nodes distribute incoming requests to the appropriate Query Nodes or Data Nodes.

## 3. **Data Organization**

Different nodes in BanyanDB are responsible for different parts of the database, while Query and Liaison Nodes manage the routing and processing of queries.

### 3.1 Meta Nodes

Meta Nodes store all high-level metadata that describes the cluster. This data is kept in an etcd-backed database on disk, including information about the shard allocation of each Data Node. This information is used by the Liaison Nodes to route data to the appropriate Data Nodes, based on the sharding key of the data.

By storing shard allocation information, Meta Nodes help ensure that data is routed efficiently and accurately across the cluster. This information is constantly updated as the cluster changes, allowing for dynamic allocation of resources and efficient use of available capacity.

### 3.2 Data Nodes

Data Nodes store all raw time series data, metadata, and indexed data. On disk, the data is organized by `<group>/shard-<shard_id>/<segment_id>/`. The segment is designed to support retention policy.

### 3.3 Query Nodes

Query Nodes do not store data. They handle the computational tasks associated with data queries, interacting directly with Data Nodes to execute queries and return results.

### 3.4 Liaison Nodes

Liaison Nodes do not store data but manage the routing of incoming requests to the appropriate Query or Data Nodes. They also provide authentication, TTL, and other security services.

## 4. **Determining Optimal Node Counts**

When creating a BanyanDB cluster, choosing the appropriate number of each node type to configure and connect is crucial. The number of Meta Nodes should always be odd, for instance, “3”. The number of Data Nodes scales based on your storage and query needs. The number of Query Nodes and Liaison Nodes depends on the expected query load and routing complexity.

The BanyanDB architecture allows for efficient clustering, scaling, and high availability, making it a robust choice for time series data management.

## 5. Writes in a Cluster

In BanyanDB, writing data in a cluster is designed to take advantage of the robust capabilities of underlying storage systems, such as Google Compute Persistent Disk or Amazon S3(TBD). These platforms ensure high levels of data durability, making them an optimal choice for storing raw time series data.

### 5.1 Data Replication

Unlike some other systems, BanyanDB does not support application-level replication, which can consume significant disk space. Instead, it delegates the task of replication to these underlying storage systems. This approach simplifies the BanyanDB architecture and reduces the complexity of managing replication at the application level. This approach also results in significant data savings.

The comparison between using a storage system and application-level replication boils down to several key factors: reliability, scalability, and complexity.

**Reliability**: A storage system provides built-in data durability by automatically storing data across multiple systems. It's designed to deliver 99.999999999% durability, ensuring data is reliably stored and available when needed. While replication can increase data availability, it's dependent on the application's implementation. Any bugs or issues in the replication logic can lead to data loss or inconsistencies.

**Scalability**: A storage system is highly scalable by design and can store and retrieve any amount of data from anywhere. As your data grows, the system grows with you. You don't need to worry about outgrowing your storage capacity. Scaling application-level replication can be challenging. As data grows, so does the need for more disk space and compute resources, potentially leading to increased costs and management complexity.

**Complexity**: With the storage system handling replication, the complexity is abstracted away from the user. The user need not concern themselves with the details of how replication is handled. Managing replication at the application level can be complex. It requires careful configuration, monitoring, and potentially significant engineering effort to maintain.

Futhermore, the storage system might be cheaper. For instance, S3 can be more cost-effective because it eliminates the need for additional resources required for application-level replication. Application-level replication also requires ongoing maintenance, potentially increasing operational costs.

### 5.2 Data Sharding

hanahmily marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Data distribution across the cluster is determined based on the `shard_num` setting for a group and the specified `entity` in each resource, be it a stream or measure. The resource’s `name` with its `entity` is the sharding key, guiding data distribution to the appropriate Data Node during write operations.

Liaison Nodes retrieve shard mapping information from Meta Nodes to achieve efficient data routing. This information is used to route data to the appropriate Data Nodes based on the sharding key of the data.

This sharding strategy ensures the write load is evenly distributed across the cluster, enhancing write performance and overall system efficiency. BanyanDB uses a hash algorithm for sharding. The hash function maps the sharding key (resource name and entity) to a node in the cluster. Each shard is assigned to the node returned by the hash function.

### 5.3 Data Write Path

Here's a text-based diagram illustrating the data write path in BanyanDB:

```
User
|
| API Request (Write)
|
v
------------------------------------
| Liaison Node | <--- Stateless Node, Routes Request
| (Identifies relevant Data Nodes |
| and dispatches write request) |
------------------------------------
|
v
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
| Data Node 1 | | Data Node 2 | | Data Node 3 |
| (Shard 1) | | (Shard 2) | | (Shard 3) |
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead, it delegates the task of replication to these underlying storage systems.

I think diagram is not complete, should we add more detail diagram about how to delegates the task of replication to these underlying storage systems?

Copy link
Contributor

@sollhui sollhui Jul 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

like :
image

Copy link
Contributor Author

@hanahmily hanahmily Jul 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Make sense. You could push a "suggestion" to update the text diagram.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry. The data node doesn't necessarily have to be built on "shared" storage. It just requires a robust one in case of a potential single point of failure. Therioally, the whole architecture is shared-nothing instead of shared storage.

hanahmily marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

```

1. A user makes an API request to the Liaison Node. This request is a write request, containing the data to be written to the database.
2. The Liaison Node, which is stateless, identifies the relevant Data Nodes that will store the data based on the entity specified in the request.
3. The write request is executed across the identified Data Nodes. Each Data Node writes the data to its shard.

This architecture allows BanyanDB to execute write requests efficiently across a distributed system, leveraging the stateless nature and routing/writing capabilities of the Liaison Node, and the distributed storage of Data Nodes.

## 6. Queries in a Cluster

BanyanDB utilizes a distributed architecture that allows for efficient query processing. When a query is made, it is directed to a Query Node.

### 6.1 Query Routing

Query Nodes differ from Liaison Nodes in that they do not store shard mapping information from Meta Nodes. Instead, they access all Data Nodes to retrieve the necessary data for queries. As the query load is lower, it is practical for query nodes to access all data nodes for this purpose. It may increase network traffic, but simplifies scaling out of the cluster.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It may be necessary to explain the impact of the datanodes scale on the long tail of the query

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It could. Side effects of this solution is there for sure. No matter we wrote or not.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@hanahmily hanahmily Jul 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This pattern is good at batching and aggregation. Some scenarios can leverage it:

  • Ad-hoc "TopN" is a classic aggregation operation. OAP's service and instance TopN metric query will benefit from this pattern.
  • "MultiGet" is a batching operation on several entities, which is natural to retrieve data from all data nodes.
  • A Skywalking UI's classic Dashboard will fetch several metrics belonging to an entity. The OAP generates several query operations to fetch data from DB. If it can combine them to issue a batch operation, BanyanDB will perform better than the one with several separate queries.

The scenarios serve as examples to illustrate the potential of "stateless query". As core contributors, we must possess a thorough understanding of this concept.


Compared to the write load, the query load is relatively low. For instance, in a time series database, the write load is typically 100x higher than the query load. This is because the write load is driven by the number of devices sending data to the database, while the query load is driven by the number of users accessing the data.

This strategy enables scaling out of the cluster. When the cluster scales out, the query node can access all data nodes without any mapping info changes. It eliminates the need to backup previous shard mapping information, reducing complexity of scaling out.

### 6.2 Query Execution

Parallel execution significantly enhances the efficiency of data retrieval and reduces the overall query processing time. It allows for faster response times as the workload of the query is shared across multiple shards, each working on their part of the problem simultaneously. This feature makes BanyanDB particularly effective for large-scale data analysis tasks.

In summary, BanyanDB's approach to querying leverages its unique distributed architecture, enabling high-performance data retrieval across multiple shards in parallel.

### 6.3 Query Path

```
User
|
| API Request (Query)
|
v
------------------------------------
| Liaison Node | <--- Routes the User's Request
| (Routes the request to the Query Node)|
------------------------------------
|
| API Request (Query)
|
v
------------------------------------
| Query Node | <--- Stateless Node
| (Identify relevant Data Nodes) |
------------------------------------
| | |
v v v
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
| Data Node 1 | | Data Node 2 | | Data Node 3 |
| (Shard 1) | | (Shard 2) | | (Shard 3) |
----------------- ----------------- -----------------

```

1. A user makes an API request to the Liaison Node. This request may be a query for specific data.
2. The Liaison Node routes the request to the appropriate Query Node.
3. The Query Node, which is stateless, select all data nodes.
4. The query is executed in parallel across all Data Nodes. Each Data Node processes the data stored in its shard concurrently with the others.
5. The results from each shard are then returned to the Query Node, which consolidates them into a single response to the user.

This architecture allows BanyanDB to execute queries efficiently across a distributed system, leveraging the routing capabilities of the Liaison Node, the stateless nature of Query Nodes, and the parallel processing of Data Nodes.