-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HIVE-28658 Add Iceberg REST Catalog client support #5628
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Change-Id: I5bb2559f7ca602b71f8ca03c852e2deff1a1bc52
|
Class.forName("org.apache.iceberg.hive.HiveIcebergRESTCatalogClientAdapter", true, Utilities.getSessionSpecifiedClassLoader()); | ||
IMetaStoreClient restCatalogMetastoreClient = ReflectionUtils.newInstance(handlerClass, conf); | ||
restCatalogMetastoreClient.reconnect(); | ||
return restCatalogMetastoreClient; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't disagree with this approach. However, if we replace IMetaStoreClient, I'd like you to resolve HIVE-12679, which is more generic and allows users to use Glue or another service.
Committers have asked us to discover solutions to implement some of SessionHiveMetaStoreClient's traits.
#4444
That's why we should make configurable not IMetaStoreClient but ThriftHiveMetastore.Iface.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-28658?focusedCommentId=17905019&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17905019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@okumin thanks for checking my PR. I see the point to make it configurable, but as I see the ticket you mentioned didn't get a conclusion and it was closed and not merged. So I would suggest to handle this separately and once your is merged we can refactor this. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@okumin could you please reopen your PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My PR has not reached any conclusion with which maintainers can agree. We have to reconsidering how we integrate some session features such as tmp tables.
This is the summary and my prososal. I'd like to hear your opinions as my recommendation is not aligned your PR
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fFvB0DAXJvPYv27R8nLa3tOUT67-hY0owxBrDY-BxUA/edit?usp=sharing
@zratkai Thanks for your PR! Could you give an example of a test? Or the records & screenshots you've tested? |
Change-Id: I5bb2559f7ca602b71f8ca03c852e2deff1a1bc52
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Iceberg REST client implementation added to support Iceberg REST server connection.
Why are the changes needed?
To support Iceberg REST server connection.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
Is the change a dependency upgrade?
How was this patch tested?
Unit test.