Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-31922][Connectors/AWS] Port over Kinesis Client configurations for retry and backoff strategies #165

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

karubian
Copy link
Contributor

@karubian karubian commented Sep 16, 2024

Purpose of the change

Port over Kinesis Client configurations for retry and backoff
Contains the changes from this PR: #150

Verifying this change

  • Added unit tests

Significant changes

(Please check any boxes [x] if the answer is "yes". You can first publish the PR and check them afterwards, for convenience.)

  • Dependencies have been added or upgraded
  • Public API has been changed (Public API is any class annotated with @Public(Evolving))
  • Serializers have been changed
  • New feature has been introduced
    • If yes, how is this documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

@karubian karubian changed the title [FLINK-31922][Connectors/AWS] Port over Kinesis Client configurations for retry and backoff strategoes [FLINK-31922][Connectors/AWS] Port over Kinesis Client configurations for retry and backoff strategies Sep 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hlteoh37 hlteoh37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @karubian. Left some comments

Copy link
Contributor

@hlteoh37 hlteoh37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - Thanks @karubian for the contribution!

Comment on lines 30 to +31
@Experimental
public class KinesisStreamsSourceConfigConstants {
@PublicEvolving
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmm, there's no point having both here - Only 1 is required. Because this connector is still @Experimental we can keep it that way 👀

@hlteoh37 hlteoh37 merged commit 22f154b into apache:main Sep 18, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants