Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove note about front-coded dictionaries #17705

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

techdocsmith
Copy link
Contributor

@techdocsmith techdocsmith commented Feb 7, 2025

Description

Removes the upgrade note about front-coded dictionaries from the release notes.

Fixed the bug ...

Renamed the class ...

Added a forbidden-apis entry ...

Release note


Key changed/added classes in this PR
  • MyFoo
  • OurBar
  • TheirBaz

This PR has:

  • been self-reviewed.
  • added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
  • a release note entry in the PR description.
  • added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods. Linked related entities via Javadoc links.
  • added or updated version, license, or notice information in licenses.yaml
  • added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious for an unfamiliar reader.
  • added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold for code coverage is met.
  • added integration tests.
  • been tested in a test Druid cluster.

@@ -365,21 +365,6 @@ Check out the examples at [All Druid SQL functions](../querying/sql-functions.md

## Upgrade notes and incompatible changes

### Upgrade notes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

line 368 needs to be added back

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@317brian I am not in favor of adding back a heading that will not have any content in it. Should we change the H2 to just say "Incompatible changes"?

Or put the heading back & mention "No upgrade notes to mention"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can delete it, but there's a reference to it somewhere, which is why the link checker is breaking

remove link to notes
Copy link
Contributor

@317brian 317brian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The link checker is passing now 🍡

@adarshsanjeev adarshsanjeev added this to the 32.0.0 milestone Feb 11, 2025
@adarshsanjeev adarshsanjeev merged commit 81a3f51 into apache:32.0.0 Feb 11, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants