Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix](api) make QueryDetailQueue.queryCapacity configurable #44990

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

cambyzju
Copy link
Contributor

@cambyzju cambyzju commented Dec 4, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Problem:
very large SQLs make FE OOM, here make the capacity configurable.

In branch-2.1 we already removed the usage by pr: #29999

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@cambyzju
Copy link
Contributor Author

cambyzju commented Dec 4, 2024

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

@lide-reed lide-reed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2024

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2024

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@cambyzju
Copy link
Contributor Author

cambyzju commented Dec 4, 2024

run p0

Copy link
Member

@xy720 xy720 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@cambyzju
Copy link
Contributor Author

cambyzju commented Dec 5, 2024

run buildall

@lide-reed lide-reed merged commit db2c4d4 into apache:branch-2.0 Dec 5, 2024
18 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/2.0.x reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants