Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

branch-3.0: [fix](regression) warmup_show_stmt flaky by concurrent execution #44226 #44287

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

branch-3.0: [fix](regression) warmup_show_stmt flaky by concurrent execution #44226 #44287

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #44226

@freemandealer
[fix](regression) warmup_show_stmt flaky by concurrent execution (#44226
ada22fd 
)

### What problem does this PR solve?
def hotTableName =
"regression_test_cloud_p0_cache_multi_cluster_warm_up_hotspot.customer"
    for (int i = 0; i < result.size(); ++i) {
        if (!result[i].get("TableName").equals(hotTableName)) {
org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(getLineNumber() + "cannot find expected
cache hotspot ${hotTableName}", result.size() > i + 1)
Signed-off-by: zhengyu <[email protected]>
@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Nov 19, 2024
@doris-robot
Copy link

run buildall

@dataroaring dataroaring merged commit 2e7ed69 into branch-3.0 Nov 20, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the auto-pick-44226-branch-3.0 branch November 20, 2024 01:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@doris-robot @dataroaring @freemandealer