[CELEBORN-1843] Optimize roundrobin for more balanced disk slot allocation #3074
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR looks good to me, but it should be subject to performance tests to ensure that nothing unexpected happens. The slot distribution will affect the performance. |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 20 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days. |
|
Thanks merge to main(v0.6.0) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR optimizes the RoundRobin algorithm to achieve a more balanced disk slot allocation across workers.
Previously, when allocating 3000 partitions using RoundRobin, the slot distribution across worker disks was [668, 666, 666], which resulted in one disk having 2 more slots than the others.
After the optimization, the slot distribution is now [667, 667, 666], ensuring a more balanced allocation.
Why are the changes needed?
The changes are necessary to improve load balancing across worker disks, reducing the risk of overloading a single disk. This ensures a more predictable and fair distribution of slots, which can lead to better performance and resource utilization.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
UT