Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Variables example #194

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: camel-quarkus-main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JiriOndrusek
Copy link
Contributor

Example of Variables (new feature in Camel 4.4) - apache/camel-quarkus#5620

Can be merged once Camel 4.4 is part of the CQ main branch

@aldettinger
Copy link
Contributor

@JiriOndrusek This pr might need to be rebased after the adoption of quarkus platform release 3.9.1

@JiriOndrusek
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JiriOndrusek This pr might need to be rebased after the adoption of quarkus platform release 3.9.1

Thanks!
I noticed this PR yesterday, and I plan to rebase it.

@JiriOndrusek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Failed test is not related to this PR. It is ChuckNorrisTest.testTimerLogMain


[source,shell]
----
$ mvn clean package -Pnative
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's advised to use -Dnative since a few quarkus versions.


<artifactId>camel-quarkus-examples-variables</artifactId>
<groupId>org.apache.camel.quarkus.examples</groupId>
<version>3.7.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably we need to update the version here ?

<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need to import camel-quarkus-bom-test please ?

<artifactId>rest-assured</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need the process-executor-support ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants