-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add blog post for Compactor process memory testing #421
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good.
Co-authored-by: Kevin Rathbun <[email protected]>
@dlmarion all of your suggestions should be addressed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, I would take this out of draft for review by others.
* goal rewording, renamed section to Test Scenario * small grammatical error in Goal * Update _posts/blog/2024-04-09-does-a-compactor-return-memory-to-OS.md --------- Co-authored-by: Dom G <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Content looks good overall. I made a few content-based suggestions, a few style-based ones, and a few minor error corrections.
* Changes: description to scripts, PID as arg, two_image_block more generic (alt text as param and full image URL as param), fix all instances of mb or gb when should be MB or GB. * removed outdated echo statement
…oryReturnedBlogPost
No description provided.