Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add time scaling to temporal export #388

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

randallfrank
Copy link
Collaborator

Improve error handling
Add "time_scale" mechanism to allow timeline adjustment during export.

Improve error handling
Add "time_scale" mechanism to allow timeline adjustment during export.
@randallfrank
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This needs to become release 0.8.6 (along with Dave's previous PR).

@mariostieriansys mariostieriansys enabled auto-merge (squash) July 12, 2024 07:58
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.40%. Comparing base (bc75539) to head (e131c2c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #388   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.40%   96.40%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        2615     2615           
  Branches      319      364   +45     
=======================================
  Hits         2521     2521           
  Misses         50       50           
  Partials       44       44           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mariostieriansys mariostieriansys merged commit b8fb338 into main Jul 12, 2024
25 checks passed
@mariostieriansys mariostieriansys deleted the fix/add_timescale branch July 12, 2024 08:42
mariostieriansys added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants