fix(sec): upgrade lxml to 4.9.1 #13185
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @chncaption! Thank you so much for creating this pull request! At this time we are unable to merge this PR because many of our tests are failing on it. If you would like to adjust this so that the tests are passing, we would be happy to merge this! We also wanted to let you know that we are in the process of upgrading our dependencies, so we can also resolve this on our end. Thank you again for contributing! |
Closed
9 tasks
|
Thank you for your contribution but this PR can not merge in this state. Close and tracking work to upgrade this dependency in #13244. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What happened？
There are 1 security vulnerabilities found in lxml 4.7.0
What did I do？
Upgrade lxml from 4.7.0 to 4.9.1 for vulnerability fix
What did you expect to happen？
Ideally, no insecure libs should be used.
The specification of the pull request
PR Specification from OSCS