-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 562
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Involuntarily leaving SC: Allow PM on forum #2393
base: devel
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Involuntarily leaving SC: Allow PM on forum #2393
Conversation
docs/docsite/rst/community/steering/steering_committee_membership.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
While we're at it, I think we should also allow discussing Ansible Community Code of Conduct violations via PM. What do you think? |
Maybe we move that to a separate discussion. Though I'd like to understand what (if anything) can be improved. |
recheck |
Sure, no problem: Revert "Allow CoC violations via PM"
I'm not sure what you mean. Since most of the discussions take place on the forum, allowing to use the forum / PMs for this process instead of using emails and therefor a different communication channel sounds like a simplification (and therefor an improvement) to me. Or did I get you wrong? |
Hi folks - before we merge, we'd need to understand how 'private' a forum DM is. As in can all forum Admins see it? Can forum moderators see it? I dunno the answer to either question but I'll try to dig them up. |
How "private" is an email if you don't use E2E encryption? We don't require S/MIME or PGP for email communication as far as I know. So I should say that a PM is better because only the forum admins might see it. An unencrypted email is far less secure IMHO. |
Regarding Code of Conduct. If we want to review that I'd prefer that to be done clearly and as a dedicated separate task. |
I think we should change the process and allow to contact possibly inactive SC members via a private message on the forum.
After all, we've moved most (all?) discussions and votes to the forum. So we can assume that SC members are active there, can't we?