-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: transformDates now aware that data property can be undefined #10
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update involves enhancing the Changes
Related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #10 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 20 21 +1
Branches 4 5 +1
=========================================
+ Hits 20 21 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/index.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
src/index.ts (3)
- 26-29: The update to
transformDates
to accept a generic typeT
and the addition of a conditional check forresponse.data
before performing date transformation are both positive changes. These modifications enhance the function's flexibility and robustness by ensuring it can handle various response types and avoid errors whenresponse.data
is undefined.- 23-32: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-24]
The rest of the file, including the
DateTransformerConfig
interface,recursiveDateConversion
, andisDateString
functions, remains unchanged and appears to be consistent with the modifications made totransformDates
. The use of generics intransformDates
andcreateAxiosDateTransformer
does not introduce any apparent issues with these existing functions. However, it's important to ensure that therecursiveDateConversion
function is thoroughly tested with various data structures to confirm its compatibility with the generic typeT
.
- 23-32: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [30-39]
The integration of
transformDates
withincreateAxiosDateTransformer
andaddAxiosDateTransformer
functions remains consistent with the changes made. The use of generics in these functions aligns with the updatedtransformDates
function, ensuring type safety and flexibility across different response types. This consistency supports the overall objective of enhancing the robustness and adaptability of the date transformation process.
resolves #9 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
transformDates
function to handle responses more effectively by checking for the presence ofresponse.data
before transforming dates.