fix: transformDates now aware that data property can be undefined

[angelxmoreno]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Improved the transformDates function to handle responses more effectively by checking for the presence of response.data before transforming dates.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update involves enhancing the transformDates function to be more versatile and error-resistant. By introducing a generic type T and adding a check for the existence of response.data, the function now safely handles cases where the data property might be undefined. This modification ensures the function's robustness in diverse scenarios, maintaining its primary functionality while preventing potential errors related to undefined data.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/index.ts	Updated transformDates to accept a generic type and added a check for response.data presence

Related issues

• The transformDates function should be aware that the data property in the response object can be undefined. #9: The issue's objectives align with the PR's changes, as both aim to enhance the transformDates function's handling of undefined data properties. This PR directly addresses the issue's goals by ensuring that the function does not throw errors or produce unexpected results when data is undefined, while also preserving its expected behavior when data is present.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (149d466) 100.00% compared to head (b6276b3) 100.00%.
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #10   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           20        21    +1     
  Branches         4         5    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits            20        21    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f917b9d and b6276b3.

Files selected for processing (1)

• src/index.ts (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 3

src/index.ts (3)

• 26-29: The update to transformDates to accept a generic type T and the addition of a conditional check for response.data before performing date transformation are both positive changes. These modifications enhance the function's flexibility and robustness by ensuring it can handle various response types and avoid errors when response.data is undefined.
• 23-32: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-24]

The rest of the file, including the DateTransformerConfig interface, recursiveDateConversion, and isDateString functions, remains unchanged and appears to be consistent with the modifications made to transformDates. The use of generics in transformDates and createAxiosDateTransformer does not introduce any apparent issues with these existing functions. However, it's important to ensure that the recursiveDateConversion function is thoroughly tested with various data structures to confirm its compatibility with the generic type T.

• 23-32: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [30-39]

The integration of transformDates within createAxiosDateTransformer and addAxiosDateTransformer functions remains consistent with the changes made. The use of generics in these functions aligns with the updated transformDates function, ensuring type safety and flexibility across different response types. This consistency supports the overall objective of enhancing the robustness and adaptability of the date transformation process.

[angelxmoreno]

resolves #9