ci: changes to contract builds #605
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to several GitHub Actions workflow files, a Rust source file, and a Makefile. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)
79-82: Fix trailing spaces in YAML conditionsThe upload conditions are logically correct and align with the PR objectives. However, there are trailing spaces that should be removed for better YAML formatting.
- if: > - github.base_ref == 'development' || - github.base_ref == 'main' || - contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: build') + if: > + github.base_ref == 'development' || + github.base_ref == 'main' || + contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: build')🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
101-104: Fix trailing spaces in schema upload conditionsThe conditions mirror the build job's upload conditions correctly, but contain the same trailing spaces issue.
- if: > - github.base_ref == 'development' || - github.base_ref == 'main' || - contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: build') + if: > + github.base_ref == 'development' || + github.base_ref == 'main' || + contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: build')🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 102-102: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 103-103: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/release.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/rust.yml(2 hunks)packages/std/src/ado_contract/app.rs(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/std/src/ado_contract/app.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/rust.yml
95-95: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/rust.yml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 102-102: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 103-103: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
19-19: Consider investigating the need for sudo.
While adding sudo might resolve permission issues during schema generation, it's generally recommended to avoid using elevated permissions in CI/CD workflows unless absolutely necessary.
Consider investigating:
- Why elevated permissions are needed for schema generation
- If the permission issues can be resolved in the
build_schema.shscript itself - If file/directory permissions can be properly set during earlier steps
Let's examine the script to understand the permission requirements:
.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)
58-58: LGTM: Build job condition aligns with PR objectives
The condition to only run builds on pull requests is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's goal of refining the build process.
93-93: LGTM: Schema build condition is consistent
The condition matches the build job's PR-only execution policy, maintaining consistency across the workflow.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (1)
79-82: Fix trailing spaces in multiline conditionsThe multiline conditions have trailing spaces that should be removed for cleaner YAML.
Apply this formatting fix to both conditions:
if: > - github.base_ref == 'development' || - github.base_ref == 'main' || + github.base_ref == 'development' || + github.base_ref == 'main' || contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: build')Also applies to: 101-104
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/rust.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/rust.yml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 102-102: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 103-103: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)
58-58: LGTM! Optimization to run builds only on PRs
The added conditions align well with the PR objectives, ensuring that contract builds and schema generations only occur during pull requests. This is a good optimization that prevents unnecessary builds on direct pushes.
Also applies to: 93-93
79-82: LGTM! Smart conditional artifact uploads
The added conditions ensure artifacts are only uploaded for PRs targeting important branches or those explicitly marked for building. This aligns perfectly with the PR objectives and provides good control over artifact generation.
Also applies to: 101-104
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
crnbarr93
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (1)
79-83: Fix trailing spaces in conditionsThe conditional logic is correct but there are trailing spaces that should be removed.
Apply this diff to fix the trailing spaces:
if: > - github.base_ref == 'development' || - github.base_ref == 'main' || + github.base_ref == 'development' || + github.base_ref == 'main' || contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: build')Also applies to: 101-104
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/release.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/rust.yml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/release.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/rust.yml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 102-102: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 103-103: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)
58-58: LGTM: PR-only job conditions align with objectives
The added conditions if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' correctly implement the requirement to build contracts only on pull requests.
Also applies to: 93-93
Line range hint 1-1: Verify removal of ibc-tests job
The workflow no longer includes the ibc-tests job. Please confirm if this removal was intentional and that IBC functionality is being tested elsewhere.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
60-60: the runner of "actions-rs/toolchain@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)
58-63: Fix trailing spaces in conditional statementRemove trailing spaces from the conditional for better maintainability.
if: > github.event_name == 'pull_request' && ( - (github.base_ref == 'development' || - github.base_ref == 'main' || + (github.base_ref == 'development' || + github.base_ref == 'main' || contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: build')) && !contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: skip-build') )🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 60-60: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 61-61: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
95-100: Fix trailing spaces in conditional statementRemove trailing spaces from the conditional for better maintainability.
if: > github.event_name == 'pull_request' && ( - (github.base_ref == 'development' || - github.base_ref == 'main' || + (github.base_ref == 'development' || + github.base_ref == 'main' || contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: build')) && !contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: skip-build') )🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 97-97: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 98-98: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/release.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/rust.yml(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/rust.yml
[error] 60-60: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 61-61: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 98-98: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/release.yml (4)
43-59: Documentation updates look great!
The release documentation has been comprehensively updated with:
- Consistent use of Make commands
- Clear instructions for both standard and arm-64 builds
- Updated schema generation steps
15-16: Verify Makefile build target configuration
The switch to make build simplifies the build process, but we should ensure the Makefile is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Build configuration is properly set up
The make build command is correctly configured:
- Makefile contains the build target that executes
scripts/build_all.sh build_all.shproperly uses the CosmWasm optimizer Docker image to build the contracts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Makefile exists and contains the build target
# Expected: Makefile with 'build' target defined
# Check if Makefile exists and contains build target
if [ -f "Makefile" ]; then
echo "Makefile found. Checking for build target..."
grep -A 5 "^build:" Makefile
else
echo "Error: Makefile not found"
exit 1
fi
Length of output: 460
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the build_all.sh script exists and check its content
if [ -f "scripts/build_all.sh" ]; then
echo "build_all.sh found. Content:"
cat scripts/build_all.sh
else
echo "Error: scripts/build_all.sh not found"
fi
Length of output: 362
22-22: Verify schema generation consistency
The change from ./build_schema.sh to make schemas should maintain the same schema generation output.
✅ Verification successful
Schema generation remains consistent with the previous implementation
The change from ./build_schema.sh to make schemas is a simple wrapper that maintains the exact same schema generation process. The Makefile target directly calls the same ./scripts/build_schema.sh script, ensuring identical output. The script properly handles schema generation for all contracts by:
- Creating a
schemasdirectory if it doesn't exist - Running
cargo schemafor each contract - Organizing schemas by contract version
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify schema generation configuration
# Expected: Makefile schemas target that generates equivalent output
# Check for old schema script (for reference)
if [ -f "build_schema.sh" ]; then
echo "Old schema script still exists and should be removed"
fi
# Check Makefile for schemas target
if [ -f "Makefile" ]; then
echo "Checking schemas target implementation..."
grep -A 10 "^schemas:" Makefile
fi
Length of output: 517
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the script exists and examine its content
if [ -f "./scripts/build_schema.sh" ]; then
echo "=== Content of build_schema.sh ==="
cat "./scripts/build_schema.sh"
else
echo "build_schema.sh not found in scripts directory"
fi
# Search for any other schema-related files
echo -e "\n=== Looking for schema-related files ==="
fd schema
Length of output: 3520
17-18: Document the purpose of version-map target
A new step for creating a version map has been added, but its purpose and output are not documented.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the version map target since the previous script had some issues.
Let me check the content of the version map script to understand its implementation.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Version map creation step is well-documented in the codebase
The version-map target is properly documented and implemented:
- Creates a JSON mapping between contracts and their versions in
artifacts/version_map.json - Used as part of the deployment process (required by
deploytarget) - Implementation in
scripts/build_version_map.shis clear and well-commented
The review comment's concern about documentation has been addressed as the purpose is clearly documented in the Makefile comment: "Generates a mapping between each contract and its version"
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version-map target and any related documentation
# Expected: Makefile target and documentation explaining its purpose
# Check Makefile for version-map target
if [ -f "Makefile" ]; then
echo "Checking for version-map target..."
grep -A 5 "^version-map:" Makefile
fi
# Look for related documentation
fd -t f -e md -e txt . | xargs rg -l "version[- ]map"
Length of output: 460
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Makefile content for version-map target and surrounding context
if [ -f "Makefile" ]; then
echo "=== Checking Makefile for version-map target ==="
grep -B 2 -A 5 "version[- ]map" Makefile
fi
# Look for any scripts that might be related to version map
echo -e "\n=== Checking for related scripts ==="
fd -t f "version[_-]map" scripts/
# Search for version map references in documentation
echo -e "\n=== Checking documentation for version map mentions ==="
fd -t f -e md . | xargs rg -l "version[- ]map"
Length of output: 1757
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the version map script
echo "=== Content of build_version_map.sh ==="
cat scripts/build_version_map.sh
# Look for any usage of this version map in the codebase
echo -e "\n=== Usage of version map in codebase ==="
rg -l "version[_-]map" --type rust
Length of output: 1370
.github/workflows/rust.yml (1)
106-106: Verify schemas make target exists in repository
The schema build step now uses a make command. Let's verify this target is properly defined.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any Makefile in the repository to ensure we haven't missed it in a different location.
Let me check the content of the Makefile to see the actual definition of the schemas target.
Let me verify if the script referenced in the schemas target exists.
The schemas make target is properly defined and executable
The schemas target exists in the Makefile and executes the ./scripts/build_schema.sh script, which is present and has the correct executable permissions. The target is properly defined with appropriate build steps and success message output.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify schemas make target exists and is properly defined
# Check if Makefile exists and contains required target
if [ -f "Makefile" ]; then
echo "Checking schemas make target..."
# Check for 'schemas' target
if ! grep -q "^schemas:" Makefile; then
echo "ERROR: 'schemas' target not found in Makefile"
fi
# Display target definition if found
echo "Target definition:"
sed -n '/^schemas:/,/^[^\t]/{/^[^\t]/q;p}' Makefile
else
echo "ERROR: Makefile not found in repository root"
fi
Length of output: 226
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all Makefiles in the repository
fd Makefile
# Also search for any file that might define the schemas target
rg -l "schemas:"
Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Display the content of Makefile
cat Makefile
Length of output: 2599
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the build_schema.sh script exists and is executable
if [ -f "./scripts/build_schema.sh" ]; then
echo "build_schema.sh exists"
ls -l ./scripts/build_schema.sh
else
echo "build_schema.sh not found"
fi
Length of output: 201
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (1)
58-63: Consider extracting duplicated conditions into a reusable expression.The same conditional logic is duplicated between the
buildandbuild-schemasjobs. This could lead to maintenance issues if the conditions need to be updated.Consider using GitHub Actions' expression syntax to define a reusable condition. Here's how:
# At the top of the workflow file name: Formatting Check & Test on: push: paths: ["**.*"] pull_request: branches: [main, development] env: CARGO_TERM_COLOR: always + BUILD_CONDITION: > + !contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: skip-build') && + github.event_name == 'pull_request' && + (github.base_ref == 'development' || + github.base_ref == 'main' || + contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'ci: build')) jobs: # ... other jobs ... build: if: ${{ env.BUILD_CONDITION }} # ... rest of the job config ... build-schemas: if: ${{ env.BUILD_CONDITION }} # ... rest of the job config ...Also, remove the trailing spaces in the conditions to fix the linting errors.
Also applies to: 95-100
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 60-60: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 61-61: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 62-62: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/dependabot.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/rust.yml(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/dependabot.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/rust.yml
[error] 60-60: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 61-61: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 62-62: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 98-98: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 99-99: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (1)
77-79: Review the necessity of using sudo for make version-map.
Using sudo in CI/CD workflows can be a security risk. If elevated permissions are needed, consider:
- Adjusting file permissions in the Dockerfile or earlier in the workflow
- Modifying the script to not require root privileges
- Using GitHub Actions'
GITHUB_TOKENfor any necessary permissions
Let's check why sudo might be needed:
crnbarr93
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (1)
54-56: Remove trailing spaces in YAML conditionsRemove trailing spaces from the following lines to improve YAML formatting:
- Line 54:
development' ||- Line 55:
main ||- Line 56:
'ci: build'))- Line 91:
development' ||- Line 92:
main ||- Line 93:
'ci: build'))Also applies to: 91-93
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 54-54: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 55-55: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 56-56: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/rust.yml(4 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Makefile
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/rust.yml
[error] 54-54: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 55-55: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 56-56: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 91-91: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 93-93: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (6)
37-37: LGTM! Good optimization using matrix strategy
The matrix strategy for test types allows parallel execution of integration and unit tests, improving CI efficiency.
46-46: LGTM! Good simplification using make targets
Using make commands with the matrix variable simplifies the workflow and improves maintainability.
52-57: LGTM! Well-structured conditional build triggers
The conditions effectively implement the PR objectives by:
- Building only on pull requests
- Checking for skip-build labels
- Restricting to development/main branches or ci:build label
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 54-54: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 55-55: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 56-56: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
71-73: LGTM! Good use of make targets for build steps
The build steps correctly use the build and version-map make targets, which are properly defined in the Makefile.
89-94: Conditions mirror build job as expected
The conditions correctly match the build job, ensuring consistent behavior for schema generation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 91-91: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 93-93: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
100-100: LGTM! Consistent use of make target
The schema generation step correctly uses the make target, maintaining consistency with other build steps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)
26-31: Enhance error handling for parallel processesWhile parallelizing the linting checks is a good optimization, consider adding error handling to ensure failures are properly caught and reported.
- run: cargo fetch --quiet - name: Run linting checks run: | + set -eo pipefail cargo clippy --quiet --all --all-targets -- -D warnings & cargo fmt -- --check & - wait + if ! wait; then + echo "One or more linting checks failed" + exit 1 + fi
40-40: Consider adding timeouts and cachingWhile the matrix strategy for test types is a good improvement, consider these enhancements:
- Add a timeout to prevent hanging test jobs
- Implement cargo caching to speed up builds
Add timeout to the job:
contract-tests: timeout-minutes: 30Add caching:
steps: - uses: actions/cache@v4 with: path: | ~/.cargo/registry ~/.cargo/git target key: ${{ runner.os }}-cargo-${{ hashFiles('**/Cargo.lock') }}Also applies to: 49-49
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
8-57: Consider workflow optimization opportunitiesTo improve CI efficiency, consider:
- Using GitHub Actions cache for Rust dependencies
- Implementing job dependencies and parallel execution where possible
- Reusing common setup steps through composite actions
Example cache implementation:
- uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: | ~/.cargo/registry ~/.cargo/git target key: ${{ runner.os }}-cargo-${{ hashFiles('**/Cargo.lock') }}🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
15-15: the runner of "actions-rs/toolchain@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/build.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/rust.yml(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/build.yml
15-15: the runner of "actions-rs/toolchain@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (1)
Line range hint 1-49: Overall workflow improvements look good
The changes effectively streamline the CI process by:
- Parallelizing linting checks
- Using a matrix strategy for tests
- Moving build jobs to a separate workflow
- Simplifying test execution with make commands
These changes align well with the PR objectives of refining the build process and improving workflow efficiency.
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
1-7: LGTM! Workflow triggers align with PR objectives.
The workflow configuration correctly implements the requirement to build only on pull requests targeting main/development branches, with an additional manual trigger option.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)
20-23: Consider pinning the rust-toolchain action versionWhile using
dtolnay/rust-toolchainis a good choice, using the@mastertag could lead to unexpected breaks if the upstream action changes. Consider pinning to a specific version for better stability.- - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@master + - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@v1
46-46: Consider adding test result artifactsTo help with debugging failed tests, consider uploading test results as artifacts:
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 if: failure() with: name: test-results-${{ matrix.test-type }} path: target/debug/test-results
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/build.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/deploy.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/rust.yml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/build.yml
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)
24-29: Well-optimized linting setup!
The parallel execution of clippy and fmt checks with background processes is an excellent optimization. The quiet flags reduce log noise while maintaining functionality, and the wait command ensures both complete. The -D warnings flag maintains strict checking standards.
38-38: Excellent use of matrix strategy for test separation!
The matrix approach for different test types is a good practice that improves visibility of test failures and allows for potential parallel execution.
Also applies to: 46-46
.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)
Line range hint 1-90: Overall workflow structure looks solid!
The workflow demonstrates good practices with:
- Proper access control
- Robust artifact handling
- Comprehensive environment configuration
- Appropriate error handling for deployments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (2)
24-29: Consider error handling for parallel linting checks.While parallelizing the checks is good for performance, it might make debugging harder if multiple checks fail simultaneously. Consider adding set -e and redirecting each check's output to separate log files for better error tracking.
run: | + set -e - cargo clippy --quiet --all --all-targets -- -D warnings & - cargo fmt -- --check & + cargo clippy --quiet --all --all-targets -- -D warnings > clippy.log 2>&1 & + cargo fmt -- --check > fmt.log 2>&1 & wait + cat clippy.log fmt.log
Line range hint
1-46: Well-structured workflow optimization.The removal of build-related jobs and focus on essential checks aligns well with the PR objectives. This separation of concerns improves workflow maintainability and efficiency. Consider documenting these architectural decisions in the repository's CI/CD documentation to help future contributors understand the workflow structure.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/build.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/deploy.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/rust.yml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .github/workflows/build.yml
- .github/workflows/deploy.yml
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/rust.yml (3)
20-23: LGTM! Toolchain setup looks good.
The switch to dtolnay/rust-toolchain@v1 is a good choice. Just verify that Rust 1.75.0 is the intended version for your project's compatibility requirements.
38-38: LGTM! Good use of matrix strategy.
The matrix configuration for test types enables efficient parallel execution while keeping the workflow maintainable.
43-46: LGTM! Clean and efficient test execution setup.
The simplified make command and consistent toolchain configuration provide a clean approach to test execution.
Motivation
These changes update the
rust.ymlCI workflow to only build contracts on pull requests and only release artifacts on pull requests todevelopmentormain. Build can be triggered manually via the GitHub actions UI.Implementation
Conditional steps were added to the appropriate actions in
rust.ymlSummary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
ibc-testsjob from the workflow.Chores
makecommands for building contracts and generating schemas, optimizing the release process."ci: skip-build", to the Dependabot configuration for updates.deploytarget dependencies in the Makefile.These changes enhance the overall reliability and performance of the build and release processes.