feat: Graph ADO #526
feat: Graph ADO #526
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce notable updates to the Andromeda framework, including the addition of new features such as the Validator Staking ADO, multiple new ADOs, and enhancements to existing functionalities like staking and auction processes. Updates to the mock querier improve query handling capabilities. The project also underwent various fixes and removals, including the elimination of schema tracking. Overall, these modifications enhance the framework's extensibility and functionality. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (12)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/.cargo/config (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/examples/schema.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/mock.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/state.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/graph.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/.cargo/config
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (52)
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mod.rs (1)
1-2: LGTM!The module declarations for
mockandtestsare appropriate for organizing tests and mock data.packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs (1)
2-2: LGTM!The addition of the
graphmodule expands the library's functionality without affecting existing code.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/lib.rs (1)
1-8: LGTM!The module declarations and conditional compilation attributes are appropriate for organizing the contract, state, mock data, and tests.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/examples/schema.rs (3)
1-1: Ensure correct imports.The imports seem correct and necessary for defining the API schema.
2-2: Ensure correct imports.The import for
cosmwasm_schema::write_apiis necessary for defining the API schema.
3-10: LGTM!The
write_api!macro correctly defines the schema forInstantiateMsg,QueryMsg, andExecuteMsg.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/state.rs (3)
1-1: Ensure correct imports.The imports seem correct and necessary for defining the state storage.
2-2: Ensure correct imports.The import for
cw_storage_plus::{Map, Item}is necessary for defining the state storage.
4-6: LGTM!The state storage definitions for
MAP_INFO,MAP_POINT_INFO, andPOINTare correct and appropriate.packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/graph.rs (12)
1-1: Ensure correct imports.The imports seem correct and necessary for defining the messages and data structures.
2-2: Ensure correct imports.The import for
cosmwasm_schema::{cw_serde, QueryResponses}is necessary for defining the messages and data structures.
4-8: LGTM!The
InstantiateMsgstruct is correctly defined with themap_infofield.
10-15: LGTM!The
MapInfostruct is correctly defined with the necessary fields.
17-21: LGTM!The
MapSizestruct is correctly defined with the necessary fields.
23-32: LGTM!The
ExecuteMsgenum is correctly defined with theUpdateMapandStoreCoordinatevariants.
34-38: LGTM!The
Coordinatestruct is correctly defined with the necessary fields.
40-50: LGTM!The
QueryMsgenum is correctly defined with the necessary variants.
52-55: LGTM!The
GetMapInfoResponsestruct is correctly defined with themap_infofield.
57-60: LGTM!The
GetMaxPointResponsestruct is correctly defined with themax_pointfield.
62-65: LGTM!The
GetAllPointsResponsestruct is correctly defined with thepointsfield.
67-71: LGTM!The
CoordinateResponsestruct is correctly defined with the necessary fields.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock.rs (7)
1-13: Imports look good!The necessary modules and types for mocking and testing are correctly imported.
19-33: Functionproper_initializationlooks good!The function correctly sets up the mock environment and instantiates the contract without any issues.
35-43: Functionupdate_maplooks good!The function correctly constructs and executes the
UpdateMapmessage.
45-53: Functionstore_coordinatelooks good!The function correctly constructs and executes the
StoreCoordinatemessage.
55-61: Functionquery_map_infolooks good!The function correctly constructs the
GetMapInfoquery message and handles the response.
63-69: Functionquery_max_pointlooks good!The function correctly constructs the
GetMaxPointquery message and handles the response.
71-77: Functionquery_all_pointslooks good!The function correctly constructs the
GetAllPointsquery message and handles the response.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/mock.rs (11)
1-13: Imports look good!The necessary modules and types for mocking and testing are correctly imported.
15-16: StructMockGraphlooks good!The struct definition is straightforward and necessary for mocking the contract.
18-39: Methodinstantiatelooks good!The method correctly constructs the instantiation message and calls the
instantiate_contractfunction.
41-54: Methodexecute_update_maplooks good!The method correctly constructs the
UpdateMapmessage and calls theexecute_contractfunction with optional funds.
56-69: Methodexecute_store_coordinatelooks good!The method correctly constructs the
StoreCoordinatemessage and calls theexecute_contractfunction with optional funds.
71-75: Methodquery_map_infolooks good!The method correctly constructs the
GetMapInfoquery message and handles the response.
77-81: Methodquery_max_pointlooks good!The method correctly constructs the
GetMaxPointquery message and handles the response.
83-87: Methodquery_all_pointslooks good!The method correctly constructs the
GetAllPointsquery message and handles the response.
90-93: Functionmock_andromeda_graphlooks good!The function correctly constructs and returns the boxed contract.
95-105: Functionmock_graph_instantiate_msglooks good!The function correctly constructs the
InstantiateMsgwith the provided parameters.
107-109: Functionmock_execute_update_map_msglooks good!The function correctly constructs the
ExecuteMsg::UpdateMapwith the provided parameters.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs (6)
1-10: Imports look good!The necessary modules and types for testing are correctly imported.
11-32: Test functiontest_instantiationlooks good!The test function correctly sets up the mock environment, instantiates the contract, and verifies the map information.
34-53: Test functiontest_update_map_with_same_infolooks good!The test function correctly sets up the mock environment, attempts to update the map with the same information, and verifies the error.
56-75: Test functiontest_store_coordinate_with_wrong_range_disallow_negativelooks good!The test function correctly sets up the mock environment, attempts to store a coordinate with a wrong range, and verifies the error.
77-96: Test functiontest_store_coordinate_with_wrong_range_allow_negativelooks good!The test function correctly sets up the mock environment, attempts to store a coordinate with a wrong range, and verifies the error.
98-150: Test functiontest_store_coordinate_disallow_negative_and_update_maplooks good!The test function correctly sets up the mock environment, stores coordinates, queries points, updates the map, and verifies the results.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (7)
53-65: LGTM!The
executefunction is correctly implemented and delegates messages to the appropriate handlers.
68-90: LGTM!The
handle_executefunction is correctly implemented and handles different message types appropriately.
131-193: LGTM!The
execute_store_coordinatefunction is correctly implemented and performs proper validation and error handling.
195-203: LGTM!The
queryfunction is correctly implemented and delegates messages to the appropriate handlers.
205-211: LGTM!The
get_map_infofunction is correctly implemented and performs proper error handling.
213-228: LGTM!The
get_max_pointandget_all_pointsfunctions are correctly implemented and perform proper error handling.
26-50: Handle potential error more gracefully.The
unwrapcall in line 107 could lead to a panic if the map information is not found. Consider using a proper error handling mechanism.- .unwrap(); + .map_err(|_| ContractError::InvalidParameter { error: Some("Can not find existed map".to_string())})?;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
Do signed integers compile on chain? Not sure if negative numbers are supported by CosmWasm |
CosmWasm uses standard Rust serialization libraries like Serde, which handle signed integers correctly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (2)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs (5)
11-32: LGTM!The
test_instantiationfunction correctly tests the initialization of the map with specific parameters and verifies the stored map information.
34-53: LGTM!The
test_update_map_with_same_infofunction correctly tests updating the map with the same information and verifies that the appropriate error is returned.
56-75: LGTM!The
test_store_coordinate_with_wrong_range_disallow_negativefunction correctly tests storing a coordinate that is out of range when negative coordinates are not allowed and verifies that the appropriate error is returned.
77-96: LGTM!The
test_store_coordinate_with_wrong_range_allow_negativefunction correctly tests storing a coordinate that is out of range when negative coordinates are allowed and verifies that the appropriate error is returned.
98-150: LGTM!The
test_store_coordinate_disallow_negative_and_update_mapfunction correctly tests storing coordinates, querying the maximum point, querying all points, updating the map, and verifying the points are reset.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (6)
25-50: LGTM!The
instantiatefunction correctly initializes the contract and saves the map information.
52-66: LGTM!The
executefunction correctly handles different execute messages and delegates tohandle_execute.
68-90: LGTM!The
handle_executefunction correctly processes the execute messages and calls the appropriate function.
130-192: LGTM!The
execute_store_coordinatefunction correctly stores a coordinate and updates the points.
194-202: LGTM!The
queryfunction correctly handles different query messages and delegates to the appropriate function.
217-227: LGTM!The
get_all_pointsfunction correctly retrieves all stored points.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/mock.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/state.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/graph.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mod.rs
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs
Additional comments not posted (27)
packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs (1)
1-1: LGTM!The addition of the
graphmodule is clear and aligns with the existing module structure.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/state.rs (2)
1-2: LGTM!The imports for
CoordinateResponse,MapInfo, andcw_storage_plusare necessary and correctly included.
4-6: LGTM!The constants
MAP_INFO,MAP_POINT_INFO, andPOINTare correctly defined usingcw_storage_plus.packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/graph.rs (11)
1-2: LGTM!The imports for
andr_exec,andr_instantiate,andr_query, andcosmwasm_schemaare necessary and correctly included.
4-8: LGTM!The
InstantiateMsgstruct is correctly defined with the#[andr_instantiate]and#[cw_serde]attributes.
10-15: LGTM!The
MapInfostruct is correctly defined with the#[cw_serde]attribute and includes necessary fields.
17-21: LGTM!The
MapSizestruct is correctly defined with the#[cw_serde]attribute and includes necessary fields.
23-28: LGTM!The
ExecuteMsgenum is correctly defined with the#[andr_exec]and#[cw_serde]attributes and includes necessary variants.
30-34: LGTM!The
Coordinatestruct is correctly defined with the#[cw_serde]attribute and includes necessary fields.
36-46: LGTM!The
QueryMsgenum is correctly defined with the#[andr_query],#[cw_serde], and#[derive(QueryResponses)]attributes and includes necessary variants.
48-51: LGTM!The
GetMapInfoResponsestruct is correctly defined with the#[cw_serde]attribute and includes necessary fields.
53-56: LGTM!The
GetMaxPointResponsestruct is correctly defined with the#[cw_serde]attribute and includes necessary fields.
58-61: LGTM!The
GetAllPointsResponsestruct is correctly defined with the#[cw_serde]attribute and includes necessary fields.
63-67: LGTM!The
CoordinateResponsestruct is correctly defined with the#[cw_serde]attribute and includes necessary fields.CHANGELOG.md (1)
19-19: Entry for "Graph ADO" looks good.The entry is consistent with the existing format and provides a clear description of the addition.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock.rs (3)
33-41: LGTM!The function correctly handles the update operation and manages errors.
43-51: LGTM!The function correctly handles the store operation and manages errors.
17-17: LGTM!The type definition for
MockDepsis correct.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/mock.rs (9)
15-16: LGTM!The struct
MockGraphand its associated macromock_adoare correctly defined.
41-54: LGTM!The function correctly handles the update operation and manages errors.
56-68: LGTM!The function correctly handles the store operation and manages errors.
71-75: LGTM!The function correctly handles the query operation and manages errors.
77-81: LGTM!The function correctly handles the query operation and manages errors.
83-87: LGTM!The function correctly handles the query operation and manages errors.
90-93: LGTM!The function correctly handles the creation of the mock contract.
95-105: LGTM!The function correctly handles the creation of the instantiation message.
107-109: LGTM!The function correctly handles the creation of the update map message.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Files selected for processing (13)
Tip You can disable poems in the walkthrough.Disable the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/state.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/graph.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/state.rs
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock.rs
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/graph.rs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/mock.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/mock.rs
| ((z * 10_f64.powf(map_decimal as f64)) as i64) as f64 / 10_f64.powf(map_decimal as f64) | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| match z_coordinate { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can't this be done in a single boolean check?
z_coordinate.is_some() == is_z_allowed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It was resolved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (2)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs (1)
1-1: Verify the existence and implementation of thegraphmodule.Ensure that:
- The
graphmodule exists in the same directory as this file.- The module is implemented correctly and follows the project's coding standards.
- The module has appropriate tests.
Run the following script to verify the
graphmodule:CHANGELOG.md (1)
19-19: LGTM!The added entry for "Graph ADO" follows the changelog format and links to the relevant pull request. The AI-generated summary provides useful context about the feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs
Additional comments not posted (5)
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (5)
91-126: LGTM!The code changes in the
execute_update_mapfunction are approved.
128-253: LGTM!The code changes in the
execute_store_coordinatefunction are approved.
265-275: LGTM!The code changes in the
get_map_infofunction are approved.
277-280: LGTM!The code changes in the
get_max_pointfunction are approved.
282-292: LGTM!The code changes in the
get_all_pointsfunction are approved.
…eda-core into mdjakovic/graph-ado
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
19-19: LGTM! The changelog entry is correctly formatted and placed.The new entry for the Graph ADO feature is well-formatted and consistent with the existing entries. It's correctly placed in the "Added" section, which is appropriate for new features. The PR number (#526) matches the one mentioned in the PR objectives, ensuring traceability.
A minor suggestion to enhance clarity:
Consider expanding the description slightly to provide more context about the Graph ADO feature. For example:
- Added Graph ADO [(#526)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/526) + Added Graph ADO for managing X-Y coordinates within a defined map structure [(#526)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/526)This additional detail would give readers a better understanding of the feature's purpose without needing to refer to the PR directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
CHANGELOG.md (4)
Line range hint
19-28: LGTM! Consider grouping related features.The new entries in the "Added" section are well-formatted and provide clear, concise descriptions of the added features. Each entry includes a link to the corresponding pull request, which is excellent for traceability.
To improve readability, consider grouping related features together. For example, you could group the storage-related ADOs (String Storage, Boolean Storage, Counter) under a single bullet point.
Here's a suggestion for grouping:
- Added new ADOs: - Graph ADO [(#526)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/526) - String Storage ADO [(#512)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/512) - Boolean Storage ADO [(#513)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/513) - Counter ADO [(#514)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/514) - Date Time ADO [(#519)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/519) - IBC Registry ADO [(#566)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/566) - Added Set Amount Splitter [(#507)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/507) - Added Authorized CW721 Addresses to Marketplace [(#542)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/542) - Added BuyNow option for Auction [(#533)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/533) - Added Denom Validation in IBC Registry ADO [(#571)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/571)
Line range hint
30-50: LGTM! Consider adding more context to some entries.The "Changed" section effectively documents various modifications to existing features. Each entry includes a link to the corresponding pull request, which is great for traceability.
To improve clarity and help readers understand the impact of these changes, consider adding more context to some entries. For example:
Here are some suggestions for improvement:
- For "Module Redesign", briefly mention the key aspects of the redesign or its benefits.
- For "Primitive Improvements", provide a short list of the main improvements made.
- For "Crowdfund Restructure", mention the main goals or outcomes of this restructuring.
Example:
- Module Redesign: Improved modularity and reduced coupling between components [(#452)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/452) - Primitive Improvements: Enhanced performance and added new utility functions [(#476)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/476) - Crowdfund Restructure: Simplified user interface and improved fund management [(#478)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/478)These more detailed descriptions will help users and developers quickly understand the nature and impact of the changes.
Line range hint
52-57: LGTM! Consider adding more context to some fixes.The "Fixed" section effectively documents various bug fixes and improvements. Each entry includes a link to the corresponding pull request, which is excellent for traceability.
To provide more value to readers, consider adding brief explanations of the impact or importance of some fixes. This context can help users and developers understand which fixes might be most relevant to them.
Here are some suggestions for improvement:
- For the precision issue fix, mention the potential impact it had before the fix.
- For the permissioning fix, briefly explain the security implications of the fix.
Example:
- Fix precision issue with vestings claim batch method, preventing potential fund discrepancies [(#555)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/555) - Fix permissioning limited use consumptions and blacklist bypass scenario, enhancing overall system security [(#553)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/553)These more detailed descriptions will help users and developers quickly understand the importance and impact of the fixes.
Line range hint
59-60: Add more context to the removed item.The entry in the "Removed" section is clear but lacks context. To help users understand the implications of this change, consider adding a brief explanation of why schemas are no longer tracked and what this means for users or developers.
Here's a suggestion for improvement:
- Schemas are no longer tracked to reduce repository size and simplify maintenance. Users should now generate schemas locally when needed. [(#430)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/430)This additional context will help readers understand the reasoning behind the change and its potential impact on their workflow.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
Line range hint
1-60: Great changelog! Consider bumping the version.Overall, this changelog is well-structured and follows the Keep a Changelog format and Semantic Versioning principles. It effectively documents the various additions, changes, fixes, and removals made to the project. The inclusion of pull request links for each entry is excellent for traceability.
Given the significant number of additions and changes, it appears that this update represents a substantial evolution of the project. As such, you should consider bumping the version number accordingly.
To determine the appropriate version bump, please run the following script:
This script will analyze the changelog entries and suggest an appropriate version bump based on the nature and extent of the changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 34
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mod.rs (1)
1-3: LGTM! Well-structured test organization.The modular structure for testing is well-organized, following Rust best practices. The inclusion of mock modules (
mockandmock_querier) alongside atestsmodule suggests a good separation of concerns in the test suite.Consider adding a brief module-level documentation comment explaining the purpose of each module. This can help other developers quickly understand the testing structure. For example:
//! Testing utilities and cases for the Andromeda graph data storage. /// Mock implementations for testing. mod mock; /// Mock querier for simulating blockchain queries in tests. mod mock_querier; /// Test cases for the graph data storage functionality. mod tests;packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs (1)
3-4: LGTM! Consider alphabetical ordering of modules.The addition of
graphandpointmodules aligns well with the PR objectives of introducing functionality to manage X-Y coordinates within a defined map structure. These new modules expand the capabilities of theandromeda-data-storagepackage as intended.For improved readability and easier navigation, consider ordering the module declarations alphabetically. This would result in the following order:
pub mod boolean; pub mod counter; pub mod graph; pub mod point; pub mod primitive; pub mod string_storage;This minor change would make it easier to locate specific modules in the future, especially as the number of modules grows.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/examples/schema.rs (1)
1-10: Consider adding a file-level comment for clarity.While the implementation is correct and follows best practices, consider adding a brief file-level comment explaining the purpose of this schema generation file. This can help future developers quickly understand the file's role in the project.
Example comment:
// This file generates the JSON schema for the Andromeda Point ADO contract. // It defines the structure of the contract's API, including instantiation, query, and execution messages.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/state.rs (2)
5-7: LGTM: Constants are well-defined and align with PR objectives.The constants DATA, DATA_OWNER, and RESTRICTION are appropriately defined using cw_storage_plus::Item, which is suitable for persistent storage in CosmWasm contracts. The types used match the imported types, and the string identifiers are unique and descriptive.
For consistency, consider using all uppercase for the string identifiers:
-pub const DATA: Item<PointCoordinate> = Item::new("data"); -pub const DATA_OWNER: Item<Addr> = Item::new("data_owner"); -pub const RESTRICTION: Item<PointRestriction> = Item::new("restriction"); +pub const DATA: Item<PointCoordinate> = Item::new("DATA"); +pub const DATA_OWNER: Item<Addr> = Item::new("DATA_OWNER"); +pub const RESTRICTION: Item<PointRestriction> = Item::new("RESTRICTION");This change would align the string identifiers with the constant names, which is a common convention in Rust.
5-7: Consider adding documentation comments for each constant.While the constant names are descriptive, adding documentation comments would further improve code readability and maintainability. This is especially important for public constants that may be used across different parts of the project.
Consider adding documentation comments like this:
/// Stores the coordinate data for a point. pub const DATA: Item<PointCoordinate> = Item::new("data"); /// Stores the address of the data owner. pub const DATA_OWNER: Item<Addr> = Item::new("data_owner"); /// Stores the restrictions applied to the point. pub const RESTRICTION: Item<PointRestriction> = Item::new("restriction");These comments provide clear explanations of each constant's purpose, which can be helpful for other developers working on the project.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/state.rs (2)
6-9: LGTM: Constants are well-defined and appropriate for the graph data storage.The constants are correctly implemented using
cw_storage_plustypes, which is ideal for CosmWasm contract state management. The choices ofItemandMaptypes, along with their respective key and value types, align well with the PR objectives for managing map and coordinate data.Consider adding a brief comment above each constant to describe its purpose. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:
/// Stores the overall map information pub const MAP_INFO: Item<MapInfo> = Item::new("map_info"); /// Associates point IDs with their coordinate info and storage date pub const MAP_POINT_INFO: Map<&u128, (CoordinateInfo, StoredDate)> = Map::new("map_point_info"); /// Keeps track of the total number of points in the map pub const TOTAL_POINTS_NUMBER: Item<u128> = Item::new("total_points_number"); /// Links user addresses to their respective point coordinates pub const USER_COORDINATE: Map<Addr, PointCoordinate> = Map::new("user_coordinate");
1-9: Overall implementation looks solid, with room for future enhancements.The state management for the Andromeda graph module is well-structured and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. The use of
cw_storage_plustypes ensures efficient state handling in the CosmWasm environment.For future iterations, consider implementing a more granular permission system for map and coordinate modifications. This could involve:
- Adding a
MAP_ADMINS: Map<Addr, bool>to manage users with administrative privileges.- Implementing access control checks in the contract's execute functions to ensure only authorized users can modify sensitive data.
This would enhance the security and flexibility of the graph module, especially in scenarios where multiple users or contracts interact with the same map data.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/Cargo.toml (1)
1-13: Package metadata looks good, but consider the initial version number.The package metadata is well-structured and includes all necessary information. The exclusion of build artifacts is a good practice. However, for a new package, you might want to reconsider starting with version 1.1.0. Typically, new packages start at 0.1.0 for pre-release versions or 1.0.0 for the initial stable release.
Consider changing the version to 0.1.0 or 1.0.0 if this is indeed the first release of this package.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/testing/mock.rs (1)
39-62: LGTM with a minor optimization suggestion.Both
set_pointandset_point_with_fundsfunctions are well-implemented. They correctly create and execute theSetPointmessage, withset_point_with_fundsproviding the additional functionality of including funds.Consider checking if
PointCoordinateimplementsCopy. If it does, you can avoid theclone()call:let msg = ExecuteMsg::SetPoint { - point: point.clone(), + point: *point, };This change would be a minor optimization if
PointCoordinateisCopy, reducing unnecessary cloning.packages/std/src/testing/mock_querier.rs (2)
Line range hint
286-290: LGTM! Consider using a constant for the new ADO type.The addition of the new case for code ID 5 returning "point" as the ADO type is implemented correctly and consistent with the existing pattern. To improve maintainability, consider defining a constant for the "point" ADO type, similar to how other ADO types might be defined elsewhere in the codebase.
+ const POINT_ADO_TYPE: &str = "point"; // ... match code_id { - 5 => SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Ok(to_json_binary(&"point").unwrap())), + 5 => SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Ok(to_json_binary(&POINT_ADO_TYPE).unwrap())), 3 => SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Ok(to_json_binary(&"app-contract").unwrap())), 1 => SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Ok(to_json_binary(&"ADOType").unwrap())), _ => SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Err("Invalid Code ID".to_string())), },
490-491: LGTM! Consider using the same constant for consistency.The addition of the new case for key "5" returning "point" as the ADO type is implemented correctly and aligns with the change in
handle_adodb_query. For consistency and to reduce potential errors, consider using the same constant suggested earlier.+ const POINT_ADO_TYPE: &str = "point"; // ... if key == "3" { SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Ok(to_json_binary("app-contract").unwrap())) } else if key == "1" { SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Ok(to_json_binary("ADOType").unwrap())) } else if key == "5" { - SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Ok(to_json_binary("point").unwrap())) + SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Ok(to_json_binary(POINT_ADO_TYPE).unwrap())) } else { SystemResult::Ok(ContractResult::Ok(Binary::default())) }contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/mock.rs (1)
84-94: Add documentation comments to public functionsAdding Rust doc comments to public functions enhances readability and maintainability. It helps other developers understand the purpose and usage of these functions.
packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/point.rs (2)
46-46: Correct typographical errors in error messagesThe error messages use "can not parse to f64"; the correct phrase is "cannot parse to f64."
Apply the following changes:
ContractError::ParsingError { - err: "x_coordinate: can not parse to f64".to_string(), + err: "x_coordinate: cannot parse to f64".to_string(), } ContractError::ParsingError { - err: "y_coordinate: can not parse to f64".to_string(), + err: "y_coordinate: cannot parse to f64".to_string(), } ContractError::ParsingError { - err: "z_coordinate: can not parse to f64".to_string(), + err: "z_coordinate: cannot parse to f64".to_string(), }Also applies to: 53-53, 63-63
33-41: Add unit tests for thefrom_f64methodThe
from_f64constructor is essential for creatingPointCoordinateinstances fromf64values, but it currently lacks unit tests. Adding tests will ensure that it accurately converts values and handles edge cases.Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for this method?
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/execute.rs (2)
78-79: Avoid unnecessary cloning ofpointIn line 78, you're cloning
pointbefore saving:DATA.save(ctx.deps.storage, &point.clone())?;Since
pointis not used after this line, you can avoid the clone by passing a reference:DATA.save(ctx.deps.storage, &point)?;This reduces memory usage and improves performance.
100-112: Add event attributes for point deletionIncluding event attributes when a point is deleted improves observability:
Ok(Response::new() .add_attribute("method", "delete_point") .add_attribute("sender", sender) .add_attribute("status", "point_deleted"))This helps clients and users understand the action taken and can be useful for debugging or auditing purposes.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/testing/tests.rs (1)
290-291: Correct the comment to reflect the code actionThe comment states that the point is deleted by an external user, but the code deletes the point as the owner. Update the comment to accurately describe the action.
Apply this diff to correct the comment:
- // Delete the point as external user, this will success as owner has permission to do anything + // Delete the point as the owner; this will succeed as the owner has permission to do anythingcontracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (1)
289-292: Improve clarity of error messagesThe error messages for invalid ADO types could be more descriptive to aid in debugging. Instead of generic messages, include the unexpected ADO type encountered.
For example, update the error messages as follows:
// At lines 289-292 return Err(ContractError::InvalidADOType { - msg: Some("ADO Type must be point: None".to_string()), + msg: Some("Expected ADO type 'point', but found 'None'".to_string()), }); // At lines 310-313 return Err(ContractError::InvalidADOType { - msg: Some(format!("ADO Type must be point: {:?}", ado_type)), + msg: Some(format!("Expected ADO type 'point', but found '{}'", ado_type)), });Also applies to: 310-313
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/mock.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/state.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock_querier.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/.cargo/config (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/examples/schema.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/execute.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/mock.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/query.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/state.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/testing/mock.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/testing/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/testing/tests.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/graph.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/point.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/std/src/testing/mock_querier.rs (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/.cargo/config
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/testing/mod.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (37)
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/lib.rs (2)
1-9: Well-structured module organizationThe module structure is well-organized and follows good practices for a Rust smart contract project:
- The
contractmodule is public, which is appropriate for the main entry point.- The
execute,query, andstatemodules are private, promoting good encapsulation.- The
testingmodule is conditionally compiled for test configurations.This structure provides a clear separation of concerns and maintainability.
3-4: Appropriate configuration for mock moduleThe
mockmodule is well-configured:
- It's public, allowing its use in tests from other modules.
- It's conditionally compiled only when not targeting WebAssembly (
not(target_arch = "wasm32")).- It requires the "testing" feature to be enabled.
This setup ensures that the mock implementations are available for testing but not included in the production build, which is an excellent practice for maintaining a clean and efficient production codebase.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/examples/schema.rs (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The import statements are concise and import only the necessary components. The
andromeda_data_storage::pointimport brings in the required message types, while thecosmwasm_schemaimport provides thewrite_api!macro for schema generation.
3-10: LGTM: Main function correctly implements schema generation.The
mainfunction effectively uses thewrite_api!macro to generate the schema for the Andromeda data storage module. It correctly specifies the three main message types (InstantiateMsg,QueryMsg, andExecuteMsg) required for a typical CosmWasm contract.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/state.rs (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The import statements are concise and import only the necessary types and modules. This is a good practice as it keeps the code clean and reduces potential naming conflicts.
1-7: Overall, the implementation is solid and aligns well with the PR objectives.The
state.rsfile successfully defines the necessary storage items for the Graph ADO feature. The code is concise, well-structured, and uses appropriate types and storage mechanisms. The minor suggestions provided (consistent string identifiers and documentation comments) would further enhance the code quality, but the current implementation is functional and meets the requirements.To ensure that these constants are used correctly throughout the project, let's run a quick check:
This script will help verify that the constants are being used appropriately in other parts of the project.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/state.rs (1)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports cover all necessary types and modules for the graph data storage functionality. The use of
andromeda_data_storageandcosmwasm_stdaligns well with the project's ecosystem and smart contract nature.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/Cargo.toml (3)
15-16: Library configuration is correct for a CosmWasm smart contract.The crate types ["cdylib", "rlib"] are appropriate, allowing the contract to be compiled as both a WebAssembly module and a Rust library. This configuration supports both contract deployment and testing scenarios.
18-23: Features are well-defined and appropriate.The features section is well-structured:
- The
backtracesfeature is useful for debugging.- The
libraryfeature provides flexibility in how the crate can be used.- The
testingfeature correctly includes necessary dependencies for testing.This configuration allows for various use cases and development scenarios.
35-37: Target-specific dependencies are correctly configured.The conditional dependencies for non-wasm32 targets are well-specified:
- cw-multi-test and andromeda-testing are correctly included as optional dependencies.
- This configuration ensures these testing dependencies are only included when necessary, which is a good practice for maintaining a clean build for the WebAssembly target.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/Cargo.toml (5)
1-6: LGTM: Package metadata is well-defined.The package metadata is complete and follows standard conventions. Using a recent Rust version (1.75.0) is beneficial for leveraging newer language features and optimizations.
8-12: LGTM: Appropriate exclusion of build artifacts.The
excludesection correctly omits build artifacts ("contract.wasm" and "hash.txt") from the package. This is a good practice to maintain a clean and minimal package. The comment provides clear context for future maintainers.
16-24: LGTM: Well-structured library configuration and feature set.The
[lib]section correctly specifies both "cdylib" and "rlib" crate types, suitable for a WASM contract and a Rust library, respectively.The
[features]section is well-defined:
- "backtraces" for debugging (linked to cosmwasm-std)
- "library" to disable exports (useful for including this as a dependency)
- "testing" to include necessary testing dependencies
These features provide flexibility for different use cases and the comments offer clear explanations.
37-39: LGTM: Appropriate configuration for target-specific dependencies.The target-specific dependencies are well-configured:
- Conditional inclusion for non-wasm32 targets keeps the WASM binary size minimal.
- Optional dependencies for "cw-multi-test" and "andromeda-testing" align with the "testing" feature.
This setup effectively separates the production and testing environments.
26-34: LGTM: Dependencies are well-structured. Please verify "rates" feature usage.The dependencies section is well-organized:
- Workspace-level version management ensures consistency across the project.
- Includes appropriate CosmWasm and Andromeda-specific libraries.
Could you please verify if the "rates" feature for
andromeda-stdis necessary for this specific contract? If it's not used, consider removing it to keep the dependency minimal.✅ Verification successful
Verified: The "rates" feature is actively used and necessary for the project.
The "rates" feature is utilized across multiple modules and contracts, ensuring its necessity for the current implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of "rates" feature from andromeda-std # Test: Search for imports or uses of "rates" feature rg --type rust -e 'use andromeda_std::.*rates' -e 'andromeda_std::.*rates'Length of output: 2603
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/testing/mock.rs (4)
1-16: LGTM: Imports and type alias are well-structured.The imports cover all necessary components from
andromeda_data_storage,andromeda_std, andcosmwasm_std. TheMockDepstype alias is correctly defined, following common CosmWasm testing patterns.
31-37: LGTM:query_pointfunction is well-implemented.The function correctly queries for a
PointCoordinateand handles the result appropriately. The error handling is robust, propagating any errors that might occur during the query or deserialization process.
64-68: LGTM:delete_pointfunction is well-implemented.The
delete_pointfunction correctly executes theDeletePointmessage. It's consistent with the other functions in the file, usingmock_infoto create the appropriateMessageInfo. The implementation is straightforward and serves its purpose well in the testing context.
1-68: Overall, excellent implementation of mock functions for testing.This file provides a comprehensive set of mock functions that will greatly facilitate testing of the Andromeda data storage contract. The functions cover all necessary operations (initialization, querying, setting, and deleting points) and are well-structured and consistent.
A few minor suggestions for improvement were made:
- Parameterizing the owner in the
proper_initializationfunction for more flexible testing scenarios.- Potentially optimizing the
set_pointfunctions by avoidingclone()ifPointCoordinateimplementsCopy.These suggestions aside, the implementation is solid and will serve its testing purpose well. Great job on creating a thorough testing framework!
packages/std/src/testing/mock_querier.rs (1)
Line range hint
286-291: Summary: New ADO type "point" successfully integrated into mock querier.The changes successfully add support for a new ADO type "point" with code ID 5 in both
handle_adodb_queryandhandle_adodb_raw_querymethods. This enhancement allows for more comprehensive testing of the Graph ADO feature mentioned in the PR objectives.To further improve the code:
- Consider defining a constant for the "point" ADO type to enhance maintainability.
- Ensure that this new ADO type is properly documented in the relevant parts of the codebase.
- Verify that corresponding unit tests have been added or updated to cover scenarios involving this new ADO type.
To ensure comprehensive test coverage for the new ADO type, please run the following script:
Also applies to: 490-492
✅ Verification successful
✅ Test Coverage Verified for "point" ADO Type
The added "point" ADO type with code ID 5 is adequately covered by existing test cases in the codebase. Multiple test functions have been identified that handle various scenarios involving the "point" ADO type, ensuring comprehensive testing as per the PR objectives.
Recommendations for Further Improvement:
- Enhance Test Documentation: Consider adding comments within test files to describe the purpose and scenarios of each test function. This will improve maintainability and clarity for future developers.
- Review Test Coverage Scope: Although tests exist, periodically review them to ensure they cover all edge cases and potential failure points related to the "point" ADO type.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test coverage of the new "point" ADO type # Test: Search for test cases involving the new "point" ADO type rg --type rust -i 'test.*point.*ado' # Test: Verify if there are any TODOs related to testing the new ADO type rg --type rust -i 'todo.*test.*point' # Test: Check if the new ADO type is properly imported in test files rg --type rust -i 'use.*point.*ado'Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive check for test coverage of the new "point" ADO type # Test 1: Search for any occurrence of "point" in test files rg --type rust 'point' --glob '*_test.rs' # Test 2: Look for test functions that might handle multiple ADO types, including "point" rg --type rust 'fn\s+test_.*' --glob '*_test.rs' | grep 'point' # Test 3: Check for mentions of "point" in documentation or comments within test files rg --type rust '#.*point' --glob '*_test.rs'Length of output: 599
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected scripts to check for test coverage of the new "point" ADO type # Test 1: Search for any occurrence of "point" in all Rust test files, including subdirectories rg --type rust 'point' -g '*_test.rs' # Test 2: Look for test functions that handle the "point" ADO type rg --type rust 'fn\s+test_.*point.*' -g '*_test.rs' # Test 3: Check for mentions of "point" in documentation or comments within Rust test files rg --type rust '#.*point' -g '*_test.rs' # Additional Test 4: List all Rust test files to ensure they are being searched rg --files --type rust -g '*_test.rs'Length of output: 621
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broad search for test coverage of the new "point" ADO type without restrictive patterns # Test 1: List all Rust test files regardless of naming convention find . -type f -name '*_test.rs' -o -name 'test_*.rs' # Test 2: Search for any occurrence of "point" in all Rust files rg --type rust 'point' # Test 3: Look for test functions that might handle the "point" ADO type rg --type rust 'fn\s+test_.*' | grep 'point' # Test 4: Check for mentions of "point" in documentation or comments rg --type rust '#.*point' # Test 5: List all Rust files to ensure they are being searched rg --files --type rustLength of output: 87747
packages/andromeda-data-storage/src/graph.rs (1)
25-41: Ensure proper authorization for execute messages that modify stateOperations like
UpdateMap,StoreCoordinate,StoreUserCoordinate, andDeleteUserCoordinatemodify the contract's state. Ensure that appropriate authorization checks are implemented to prevent unauthorized access or modifications.Review the execute message handlers to confirm that authorization is enforced where necessary.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/contract.rs (5)
23-44:instantiatefunction is implemented correctlyThe initialization logic properly sets up the contract, initializing the ADOContract and saving the restriction from the
InstantiateMsg. All necessary components are correctly initialized.
46-60:executefunction handles messages appropriatelyThe
executefunction correctly processes theAMPReceivemessage by delegating toADOContract::execute_amp_receive. Other messages are appropriately handled by thehandle_executefunction.
62-69:queryfunction routes queries correctlyThe
queryfunction matches theQueryMsgvariants and returns the appropriate data. Unknown queries are delegated toADOContract::query, ensuring extensibility.
72-74:migratefunction properly handles contract migrationThe
migratefunction delegates migration toADOContract::migrate, ensuring that contract upgrades are managed consistently with versioning.
19-20: Version constants are correctly definedThe constants
CONTRACT_NAMEandCONTRACT_VERSIONare properly set, which is essential for migration and contract identity.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/mock.rs (1)
56-64: Ensureself.executeis properly definedIn the
execute_add_ratemethod, you're callingself.execute(...), but it's not explicitly defined in this context. Verify that theexecutemethod is correctly implemented forMockPoint.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock.rs (3)
1-17: Imports and Type Definitions Are Well-OrganizedThe imports are appropriately grouped, and the type alias
MockDepsis clearly defined, enhancing readability and maintainability.
20-31: Initialization Functionproper_initializationIs CorrectThe
proper_initializationfunction correctly sets up the mock dependencies and initializes the contract with the providedMapInfo. Usage ofmock_dependencies_custom,mock_info, andmock_envis appropriate for the testing context.
33-77: Execution Helper Functions Are Well-ImplementedThe helper functions
update_map,store_coordinate,store_user_coordinate, anddelete_user_coordinatecorrectly construct and execute the respective messages. They effectively utilize theexecutefunction with proper message construction and sender information.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/mock_querier.rs (1)
24-52: Good implementation of custom dependencies for testingThe
mock_dependencies_customfunction is well-structured and effectively sets up a custom testing environment. This enhances the testing capabilities and allows for more controlled test scenarios.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/execute.rs (4)
28-44: Verify that allExecuteMsgvariants are appropriately handledThe
matchblock handles specific variants ofExecuteMsg, while defaulting toADOContract::default().execute(ctx, msg)for others:match msg.clone() { ExecuteMsg::UpdateRestriction { restriction } => update_restriction(ctx, restriction), ExecuteMsg::SetPoint { point } => set_point(ctx, point, action), ExecuteMsg::DeletePoint {} => delete_point(ctx), ExecuteMsg::Rates(rates_message) => { /* ... */ }, _ => ADOContract::default().execute(ctx, msg), }Ensure that any additional variants of
ExecuteMsgare either intentionally passed to the default ADO contract execution or explicitly handled if necessary. This prevents unexpected behavior for unhandled messages.
70-72: Confirm that permission checks cover all necessary casesYou're using the
has_permissionfunction to check if the sender is authorized:ensure!( has_permission(ctx.deps.storage, &sender)?, ContractError::Unauthorized {} );Verify that
has_permissionadequately checks all required permission levels, especially if there are multiple roles or levels of access control in your system. This ensures only authorized users can set points.
76-76: Ensure comprehensive validation of the pointThe
point.validate()method is called to validate the point:point.validate()?;Confirm that this validation checks all necessary constraints, such as bounds defined in
PointRestriction. This prevents invalid or out-of-bound points from being stored.
136-140: Prevent potential underflow in refund calculationThe refund calculation uses
checked_sub, which can returnNoneif underflow occurs:let refund = sent_funds.amount.checked_sub(tax_amount)?;Even though there's a check
if sent_funds.amount > tax_amount, consider handling theNonecase explicitly or usingsaturating_subto prevent panics due to underflow.contracts/data-storage/andromeda-point/src/testing/tests.rs (1)
321-322:⚠️ Potential issueAssert the specific error for unauthorized deletion in
test_query_data_ownerWhen
external_user2attempts to delete data owned byexternal_user, assert that theUnauthorizederror is returned to ensure correct permission handling.Apply this diff to assert the expected error:
- let res = delete_point(deps.as_mut(), &external_user2).unwrap_err(); - assert_eq!(res, ContractError::Unauthorized {}); + let err = delete_point(deps.as_mut(), &external_user2).unwrap_err(); + assert_eq!(err, ContractError::Unauthorized {});Likely invalid or redundant comment.
contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/testing/tests.rs (1)
354-371: Confirm whether updating the map should clear existing coordinatesIn
test_store_coordinate_disallow_negative_and_update_map_timestamp_not_allowed, after updating the map with new dimensions, all previously stored coordinates are cleared. Is this the intended behavior? If so, consider adding documentation to inform users that updating the map will reset stored coordinates. If not, you may need to adjust the implementation to preserve existing coordinates or handle them appropriately when the map changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- contracts/data-storage/andromeda-graph/Cargo.toml
🧰 Additional context used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)
Line range hint
32-55: LGTM! Comprehensive list of changes.The Changed section provides a good overview of the modifications and improvements made to the project. The consistent formatting and pull request links are appreciated.
Consider adding brief explanations for some of the more significant changes, such as:
A short description of the impact or main features of these changes would provide more context for readers.
Line range hint
66-68: LGTM! Clear removal note.The Removed section is concise and follows the established format.
Consider adding a brief explanation of why schemas are no longer tracked and any potential impact this might have on the project or its users. This additional context would be valuable for understanding the rationale behind this significant change.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- packages/std/src/testing/mock_querier.rs (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/std/src/testing/mock_querier.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
CHANGELOG.md (3)
Line range hint
7-30: LGTM! Well-documented additions.The Added section is comprehensive and well-formatted. Each new feature or component is clearly described and linked to its corresponding pull request, which is excellent for traceability.
Highlighting the addition of the Graph ADO:
- Added Graph ADO [(#526)](https://github.com/andromedaprotocol/andromeda-core/pull/526)This addition seems significant and aligns well with the project's development direction.
Line range hint
57-64: LGTM! Clear and concise bug fixes.The Fixed section effectively communicates the issues that have been resolved. Each fix is well-described and linked to its corresponding pull request, maintaining consistency with the rest of the changelog.
Line range hint
1-68: Excellent changelog structure and consistency!The CHANGELOG.md file demonstrates exemplary adherence to the Keep a Changelog format and Semantic Versioning principles. The consistent structure across all sections (Added, Changed, Fixed, and Removed) enhances readability and makes it easy for users and developers to track the project's evolution.
Key strengths:
- Clear categorization of changes
- Consistent formatting with hyphens and pull request links
- Comprehensive coverage of project updates
This well-maintained changelog significantly contributes to the project's documentation and version tracking efforts.
Motivation
The purpose of this ADO is to store X-Y coordinates into specific map.
The map bounds or limits to where points can be stored. And also it contains decimals and allow/disallow negative numbers.
Implementation
Instantiate
Execute
Query
Testing
Unit-testing cases are added to codebase.
Version Changes
Version is set as 1.0.0
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation