Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Groupvel #30

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Groupvel #30

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

alanfbaird
Copy link
Contributor

I've updated MS_Phasevels to add optional outputs (P, S1 and S2 eigenvectors, as well as phase propagation vector) and added MS_groupvels.

MS_groupvels outputs the group velocity in vector format corresponding to a given phase angle (Note that these are generally not parallel to each other). It also optionally outputs phase polarizations (eigenvectors) and the slowness vectors.

A potential issue with this is that S1 and S2 are currently sorted by phase velocity magnitudes, but since one phase vector corresponds to separate group vectors for P, S1 and S2, this doesn't translate to group velocities very well (see the attached figure for an example: blue is "S1" and red is "S2"). They should probably be sorted by which S velocity sheet they belong to. This is simple enough to do for VTI media (by sorting based on S polarisation), but I'm not sure how to do this for the general case.

groupscatter


[~,~,vs1,vs2,vp,~,~,PE,S1E,S2E,XIS] = MS_phasevels(C,rh,inc,azi);

SNP = zeros(length(azi),3) ;
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you tidy up the indentation?

@andreww
Copy link
Owner

andreww commented Mar 11, 2016

Thanks - looks good. I've added a handful of in-line comments. If you could change things and push to your branch it will show up here.

Also, any chance of a test case and do we need to update the main documentation?

@alanfbaird
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've made most of the changes. I'll try to come up with a nice test case next week.

@andreww andreww mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants