-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/evm contract verified code #1210
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
6 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of components and utilities for an advanced code editor system, specifically tailored for EVM contract interactions. The changes include creating a modular editor infrastructure with components like Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant FullEditor
participant EditorSidebar
participant EditorTop
participant Editor
User->>FullEditor: Select/Navigate Files
FullEditor->>EditorSidebar: Render File Tree
EditorSidebar-->>User: Display Clickable File Structure
User->>EditorSidebar: Click File
EditorSidebar->>FullEditor: Update Selected File
FullEditor->>EditorTop: Show Selected File Path
FullEditor->>Editor: Load File Content
Editor-->>User: Display Code
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsContract/ContractCode.tsx (2)
37-44
: Consider adding aria-label for accessibility.The button for opening the file tree should have an aria-label for better accessibility.
<Button display={{ base: "block", md: "none", }} onClick={onOpen} size="sm" variant="outline-primary" + aria-label="Open contract file tree" >
62-62
: Consider adding validation for constructor arguments format.The constructor arguments are displayed as-is without any validation or formatting. Consider adding validation to ensure they are in the correct hexadecimal format.
-<TextReadOnly text={constructorArguments} canCopy /> +<TextReadOnly + text={constructorArguments.startsWith('0x') ? constructorArguments : `0x${constructorArguments}`} + canCopy +/>src/lib/components/editor/types.ts (1)
1-1
: Consider supporting additional EVM-related file extensions.The
EXTENSION_LIB
array only includes "sol" (Solidity). Consider adding support for other EVM-related file extensions like "yul" (Yul/inline assembly) and "vy" (Vyper).-export const EXTENSION_LIB = ["sol"]; +export const EXTENSION_LIB = ["sol", "yul", "vy"];src/lib/components/editor/FullEditorSidebarMobile.tsx (1)
23-38
: Add aria-label for better accessibility.The drawer implementation looks good, but could benefit from improved accessibility.
- <Drawer isOpen={isOpen} onClose={onClose} placement="bottom"> + <Drawer + isOpen={isOpen} + onClose={onClose} + placement="bottom" + aria-label="File tree navigation" + >src/lib/components/editor/helpers.ts (1)
14-36
: Optimize tree generation performance.The current implementation uses array operations that could be inefficient for large file trees:
find
operation in a loopslice
andjoin
for each path segment
Consider using a Map for O(1) lookups and maintaining the full path during traversal.+ let currentPath = ''; parts.forEach((part, index) => { - let existingNode = currentLevel.find((node) => node.name === part); + currentPath = index === 0 ? part : `${currentPath}/${part}`; + let existingNode = nodeMap.get(currentPath); if (!existingNode) { const extension = last(split(part, ".")); - const isFolder = extension ? !EXTENSION_LIB.includes(extension) : false; + const isFolder = !extension; const isInitializeNodePath = initialFilePath === path; const isOpen = index === 0 || isInitializeNodePath; existingNode = { name: part, isOpen, children: [], isFolder, treeLevel: index, code, - path: parts.slice(0, index + 1).join("/"), + path: currentPath, }; + nodeMap.set(currentPath, existingNode); currentLevel.push(existingNode); }src/lib/components/editor/EditorFileBody.tsx (2)
5-9
: Consider adding validation for the node prop.The
node
prop is crucial for rendering, but there's no validation to ensure required properties exist.Consider adding prop validation:
interface EditorFileBodyProps extends FlexProps { node: { isFolder: boolean; path: string; name: string; isOpen?: boolean; } & SourceTreeNode; initialFilePath: string; isNoWrap?: boolean; }
37-43
: Add aria-label for better accessibility.The text component displaying the node name should have an aria-label for screen readers.
<Text variant="body2" noOfLines={!isNoWrap ? 1 : undefined} whiteSpace={!isNoWrap ? "normal" : "nowrap"} + aria-label={`${node.isFolder ? 'Folder' : 'File'}: ${node.name}`} > {node.name} </Text>
src/lib/components/editor/EditorSidebar.tsx (1)
33-33
: Consider using useCallback for performance optimization.The state update logic could benefit from memoization to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
- const [tree, setTree] = useState(sourceTreeNode); + const [tree, setTree] = useState(sourceTreeNode); + const handleUpdateIsOpen = useCallback( + (node: SourceTreeNode, currentTree: SourceTreeNode[]): SourceTreeNode[] => + currentTree.map((n) => ({ + ...n, + isOpen: n.path === node.path ? !n.isOpen : n.isOpen, + children: handleUpdateIsOpen(node, n.children), + })), + [] + );src/lib/components/editor/EditorTop.tsx (1)
15-15
: Move color constant to theme configuration.Hardcoded color values should be managed in a theme configuration.
- const vsCodeDarkColor = "#1E1E1E";
Add to your theme configuration file:
export const theme = { colors: { editor: { background: "#1E1E1E" } } }src/lib/components/icon/SvgIcon.tsx (2)
Line range hint
4-10
: Consider grouping viewBox constants into an object.The viewBox constants could be organized into a single object for better maintainability and cleaner code structure.
-const viewboxDefault = "0 0 16 16"; -const viewBox221616 = "-2 -2 16 16"; -const viewBox101616 = "-1 0 16 16"; -const viewBox021616 = "0 -2 16 16"; -const viewBox011616 = "0 -1 16 16"; -const viewBox121616 = "-1 -2 16 16"; +const VIEW_BOX = { + default: "0 0 16 16", + "221616": "-2 -2 16 16", + "101616": "-1 0 16 16", + "021616": "0 -2 16 16", + "011616": "0 -1 16 16", + "121616": "-1 -2 16 16" +} as const;
Line range hint
1017-1023
: Consider using currentColor instead of hardcoded colors.Some icons like "pin" and "pin-solid" use hardcoded colors. Consider using currentColor for better theme support and consistency.
- fill="#707E94" + fill="currentColor"Also applies to: 1029-1035
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
src/lib/components/editor/Editor.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/editor/EditorFileBody.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/editor/EditorSidebar.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/editor/EditorTop.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/editor/FullEditor.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/editor/FullEditorSidebarMobile.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/editor/helpers.ts
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/editor/types.ts
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/icon/SvgIcon.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/module/ModuleSourceCode.tsx
(2 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsContract/ContractCode.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsContract/index.tsx
(2 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/index.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/interact/index.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/services/types/verification/evm.ts
(1 hunks)src/lib/styles/globals.css
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- src/lib/styles/globals.css
- src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/index.tsx
- src/lib/pages/interact/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/lib/components/editor/EditorTop.tsx
[error] 96-96: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsContract/ContractCode.tsx (2)
13-17
: LGTM! Well-defined interface with proper typing.The
ContractCodeProps
interface is clear and properly typed using theEvmVerifyInfoSourceFile
type.
48-56
: Verify error handling for invalid file paths.The
FullEditor
component receives file paths and content, but there's no visible error handling if theinitialFilePath
doesn't match any of the provided files.src/lib/services/types/verification/evm.ts (1)
47-47
: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.The
EvmVerifyInfoSourceFile
type is properly inferred from the Zod schema, maintaining type safety throughout the application.src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsContract/index.tsx (1)
51-53
: Verify data properties before passing to ContractCode.The code assumes that
data
object always has the required properties. Consider adding validation.src/lib/components/editor/types.ts (1)
3-14
: LGTM! Well-structured interfaces.The
FilePath
andSourceTreeNode
interfaces are well-designed for representing a hierarchical file structure. TheSourceTreeNode
appropriately extendsFilePath
with all necessary properties for tree visualization.src/lib/components/editor/FullEditorSidebarMobile.tsx (1)
13-16
: LGTM! Well-defined props interface.The interface properly extends
EditorSidebarProps
with the necessary drawer control props.src/lib/components/module/ModuleSourceCode.tsx (1)
23-23
: Verify the Editor component implementation.The Editor component is imported correctly. However, let's verify its implementation to ensure it properly handles the Monaco Editor initialization and Move syntax highlighting.
✅ Verification successful
The Editor component is properly implemented with Move syntax support
The Editor component correctly wraps MonacoEditor with Move language support, including syntax highlighting and language configuration. All required dependencies are properly installed and configured.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Editor component implementation and its dependencies # Check the Editor component implementation ast-grep --pattern 'export const Editor = ({ $$ }) => { $$ }' # Check for Monaco Editor and Move syntax configuration rg -A 10 'loadMoveSyntax|monaco-editor'Length of output: 7948
src/lib/components/icon/SvgIcon.tsx (3)
354-384
: LGTM! New icon implementation follows established patterns.The new "code-file" icon is well-implemented with proper SVG path definitions and follows the component's icon structure.
Line range hint
1048-1060
: LGTM! Component implementation is clean and type-safe.The SvgIcon component is well-implemented with proper typing and follows React best practices.
Line range hint
1042-1047
: LGTM! Type definitions ensure type safety.The type system is well-designed with proper constraints on icon names and props.
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsContract/index.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract/ContractCode.tsx (1)
26-64
: Consider extracting the mobile button styles into a theme constant.The mobile-specific display styles could be moved to a theme constant for better maintainability and reuse:
- display={{ - base: "block", - md: "none", - }} + display={MOBILE_ONLY_DISPLAY}src/lib/components/editor/EditorTop.tsx (3)
16-24
: Consider moving the color value to theme configuration.Hard-coded color values should be defined in a theme configuration file for better maintainability and consistency across the application.
Consider moving
vsCodeDarkColor
to your theme configuration:-const vsCodeDarkColor = "#1E1E1E";
And update the theme configuration (typically in a file like
theme.ts
):export const theme = { colors: { editor: { dark: "#1E1E1E" } // ... other theme values } }
67-77
: Enhance accessibility for the close icon.The close icon button needs proper ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
<CustomIcon name="close" boxSize={3} color="gray.600" cursor="pointer" + aria-label="Close file" + role="button" onClick={(e) => { e.stopPropagation(); onRemove(node, index); }} />
95-96
: Enhance accessibility for the chevron icon.The chevron icon needs proper ARIA attributes.
-<CustomIcon name="chevron-right" boxSize={3} color="gray.600" /> +<CustomIcon + name="chevron-right" + boxSize={3} + color="gray.600" + aria-hidden="true" + role="presentation" +/>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
CHANGELOG.md
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/editor/EditorTop.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract/ContractCode.tsx
(1 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract/index.tsx
(2 hunks)src/lib/services/types/verification/evm.ts
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/lib/services/types/verification/evm.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract/ContractCode.tsx (1)
1-17
: LGTM! Clean imports and well-defined interface.The component has a clear interface with three required props:
sourceFiles
,contractPath
, andconstructorArguments
. The imports are well-organized and use proper named imports.src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract/index.tsx (1)
43-49
: LGTM! Clean conditional rendering.The ContractCode component is properly rendered based on the currentTab state, with all required props passed correctly.
CHANGELOG.md (1)
42-42
: LGTM! Well-formatted changelog entry.The changelog entry follows the Keep a Changelog format and is placed in the correct section.
src/lib/components/editor/EditorTop.tsx (2)
1-14
: LGTM! Well-structured imports and interface definition.The imports are clean and properly scoped, and the interface follows TypeScript best practices with clear prop types.
26-34
: Verify mobile responsiveness of the file list.The file list's overflow behavior might need adjustments for better mobile experience.
✅ Verification successful
Mobile responsiveness is properly implemented ✅
The file list's overflow behavior is correctly handled with horizontal scrolling, and the component is part of a fully responsive layout system that includes:
- Horizontal scrolling for file tabs
- Mobile-optimized sidebar
- Responsive grid layout
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for responsive design tests or related components rg -l 'useBreakpointValue|sm:|md:|lg:|xl:|base:' src/Length of output: 12661
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the complete implementation of EditorTop.tsx and FullEditor.tsx echo "=== EditorTop.tsx ===" cat src/lib/components/editor/EditorTop.tsx echo -e "\n=== FullEditor.tsx ===" cat src/lib/components/editor/FullEditor.tsxLength of output: 6477
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract/ContractByteCode.tsx (1)
19-25
: LGTM! Consider adding aria-label for better accessibility.The conditional rendering is well-implemented, providing clear feedback when no byte code is available.
Consider adding an aria-label to improve accessibility:
- <Text variant="body2" color="text.disabled"> + <Text variant="body2" color="text.disabled" aria-label="No byte code available"> - </Text>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract/ContractByteCode.tsx
(2 hunks)src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/index.tsx
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/index.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/evm-contract-details-contract/ContractByteCode.tsx (1)
Line range hint
5-8
: Verify the intended type for byteCode prop.The interface shows
byteCode: Option<string>
which aligns with the null case handling in the component, but the summary suggests it was changed tostring
. Please confirm if this was intentional.Let's verify the type usage across the codebase:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes