Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix(pages): EVM Verification #1190

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

Fix(pages): EVM Verification #1190

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

Poafs1
Copy link
Collaborator

@Poafs1 Poafs1 commented Jan 14, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Bug Fixes

    • Fixed EVM contract details verification process for boarding and verification page
  • UI/UX Improvements

    • Enhanced mobile responsiveness for contract verification screens
    • Updated heading styles and component layouts
    • Refined radio button and input component designs
    • Added device-specific content rendering
  • Performance

    • Streamlined component imports and prop handling
    • Improved contract address handling in verification form

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 14, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
celatone-frontend-staging ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 14, 2025 6:36am
6 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
celatone-frontend-main ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 14, 2025 6:36am
initia-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 14, 2025 6:36am
neutron-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 14, 2025 6:36am
osmosis-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 14, 2025 6:36am
sei-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 14, 2025 6:36am
terra-celatone-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 14, 2025 6:36am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new entry in the CHANGELOG.md for a bug fix related to the EVM contract details verification process. It also implements a mobile detection hook in the NotVerifiedDetails component for responsive design. The EvmContractDetailsBytecode component has been updated to include a new contractAddress prop, while the EvmContractVerify component enhances contract address input handling with validation. Additional adjustments include UI refinements across various components, such as changes to layout properties and text labels.

Changes

File Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added bug fix entry for EVM contract details verification
src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/NotVerifiedDetails.tsx Introduced mobile detection hook and conditional rendering for mobile/desktop views
src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx Modified value prop to default to null if undefined
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsBytecode.tsx Updated component to include contractAddress prop and simplified layout
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/index.tsx Added contractAddress prop to EvmContractDetailsBytecode
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyOptions.tsx Removed maxW and size properties, updated label text
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyTop.tsx Changed heading level from h4 to h5
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/index.tsx Enhanced contract address input handling and added validation
src/lib/styles/theme/components/radio.ts Adjusted padding and font size for radio components

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • evilpeach
  • songwongtp

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through code so bright,
Verifying contracts with all my might!
Mobile or desktop, we'll make it clear,
Bug fixes dancing, have no fear!
CodeRabbit's magic makes errors flee! 🔍


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6c9aba and f2a7a00.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/index.tsx (6 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsBytecode.tsx (1)

19-21: Fix heading inconsistency.

The heading uses variant="h7" but as="h6", which could lead to inconsistent styling. Consider aligning these values.

-      <Heading as="h6" variant="h7">
+      <Heading as="h7" variant="h7">
src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/NotVerifiedDetails.tsx (1)

35-41: Consider making mobile message more concise.

The mobile message is verbose. Consider simplifying to something like: "Contract not verified. Verification available on desktop version."

src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyOptions.tsx (1)

38-45: Refactor duplicate Radio styling props.

Multiple Radio components share the same styling props. Consider extracting these into a constant or custom variant.

const radioProps = {
  variant: "gray-card",
  width: "fit-content",
  overflow: "hidden",
  w: "full",
} as const;

// Usage:
<Radio {...radioProps} value={VerificationOptions.UploadFiles}>

Also applies to: 48-55

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 58a114e and c6c9aba.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/evm-verify-section/NotVerifiedDetails.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsBytecode.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyOptions.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyTop.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/index.tsx (5 hunks)
  • src/lib/styles/theme/components/radio.ts (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/components/EvmContractVerifyTop.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/components/EvmContractDetailsBytecode.tsx (1)

16-17: Address the TODO comment about status support.

The comment indicates incomplete status support. Please clarify which statuses need to be supported and ensure they are implemented.

Would you like me to help create a tracking issue for implementing support for all verification statuses?

src/lib/styles/theme/components/radio.ts (1)

69-69: Verify accessibility impact of reduced font size.

The font size reduction from 16px to 14px for large radio buttons might affect readability. Please ensure this meets WCAG accessibility guidelines for minimum text size.

✅ Verification successful

Font size of 14px aligns with application's design system

The reduced font size of 14px is consistently used across 43 files in the codebase, including core UI components and interactive elements. This standardization suggests it's part of a deliberate design system that considers accessibility requirements for UI controls.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other components using similar font sizes
rg -l "fontSize.*14px" src/

Length of output: 2267

src/lib/components/forms/SelectInput.tsx (1)

89-89: LGTM! Proper handling of undefined values.

The change ensures consistent value handling by defaulting undefined values to null, which prevents potential issues with the chakra-react-select component and improves component stability.

src/lib/pages/evm-contract-details/index.tsx (1)

143-146: LGTM! Proper prop passing for contract verification.

The addition of the contractAddress prop to EvmContractDetailsBytecode enables contract verification functionality, aligning with the PR's objective to fix EVM verification.

src/lib/pages/evm-contract-verify/index.tsx (3)

45-45: LGTM! Improved form initialization and reactivity.

The changes properly initialize the contract address from the URL query and add it to the watch list for reactivity.

Also applies to: 49-49


119-126: LGTM! Enhanced responsive layout.

The Grid and PageContainer styling improvements provide better layout control and responsiveness.


148-152: LGTM! Added input validation feedback.

The status object provides immediate feedback on contract address validity using isHexModuleAddress.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

53-54: LGTM! Clear and well-formatted changelog entry.

The entry properly documents the bug fix with the correct PR reference and description.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants