Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xGov-109 - Unraveling Algorand's Real World Assets Landscape & DEX Swaps - by Chaintrail #109

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

ChainTrail
Copy link
Contributor

Initial xGov proposal (draft)

Initial xGov proposal (draft)
@ChainTrail ChainTrail changed the title Create xgov-109.md xGov-109 - Unraveling Algorand's Real World Assets Landscape & DEX Swaps - by Chaintrail Dec 29, 2023
Removed previous xGov referenced in order to pass the checks.
@ChainTrail
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SudoWeezy How can we reference a previous proposal and pass the validation? As soon as we reference 'xGov-61' the auto-validation starts to fail (as it needs to include a link, but neither markup formats seems to pass there).

Updated xGov proposals
Changed to final
@github-actions github-actions bot added s-final and removed s-draft labels Dec 31, 2023
@SudoWeezy
Copy link
Contributor

You can do it like this [xGov-61](https://github.com/algorandfoundation/xGov/pull/61) Or like this if the file is in the main repo [xGov-61](xgov-61.md)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the p-3 label Jan 22, 2024
@ChainTrail
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SudoWeezy hope it's still on time. But changed the abstract to something more understandable for this voting session/proposal. Thanks!

@nonfungibleab
Copy link
Contributor

Proposer, please post your algorand forum discussion thread link here. Thank you.

@ChainTrail
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SudoWeezy SudoWeezy merged commit 2b27f3f into algorandfoundation:main Feb 7, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants