-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
eval: split TestTransactionGroup from BlockEvaluator using TransactionGroupTester #5818
Open
cce
wants to merge
8
commits into
algorand:master
Choose a base branch
from
cce:parallelizable-test-txn
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f256c0d
split TestTransactionGroup and TestTransaction from BlockEvaluator us…
cce b9bc394
add extra txHandler backlogWorker
cce 7a5a883
fix lint
cce a14f3a4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into parallelizable-te…
cce b09a797
add TestBlockEvaluator for methods to hang off of
cce 38edb5c
update TestTxHandlerRememberReportErrorsWithTxPool
cce 59293c2
kill pools.testEvalContext struct and eval.TestEvalContext interface
cce 24bb98b
add eval.NewTransactionGroupTester
cce File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why 2 backlog workers vs say 4?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no particular thought on the best number, and often wonder what the best way to manage worker numbers across many different places in the code base that might have some static choice.
I do wonder if all the static choice ought to be written as a fraction of the total cores available, rather than an actual numeric constant,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left this here as a stand-in but maybe I should have it be configurable, default 1 or 2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see any useful thing to do here in the short term except pick a random small number like 2 or 3, so I vote for resolving.