Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[14.0][ADD] attachment synchronize mixins #285

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kevinkhao
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@kevinkhao kevinkhao changed the base branch from 16.0 to 14.0 October 10, 2023 03:01
@kevinkhao kevinkhao force-pushed the 14.0-attahcment_synchronize_mixins branch from 1a70d66 to 4d9a58a Compare October 10, 2023 03:02
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 53.96825% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.69%. Comparing base (73cb13c) to head (4d9a58a).
Report is 43 commits behind head on 14.0.

Files Patch % Lines
...nize_mixins/models/synchronize_exportable_mixin.py 46.15% 21 Missing ⚠️
...onize_mixins/models/attachment_synchronize_task.py 36.36% 7 Missing ⚠️
...nize_mixins/models/synchronize_importable_mixin.py 88.88% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             14.0     #285      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.93%   79.69%   -1.24%     
==========================================
  Files         117      122       +5     
  Lines        1311     1374      +63     
  Branches      249      256       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         1061     1095      +34     
- Misses        212      241      +29     
  Partials       38       38              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants