Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CLIENT-3186] CI/CD: Use entrypoint script to finish setting up strong consistency instead of the run-ee-server composite action #699

Draft
wants to merge 91 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juliannguyen4
Copy link
Collaborator

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 commented Dec 2, 2024

Extra changes:

  • Add healthcheck to check that container is ready to use through Github Actions or locally on the command line
  • CI/CD: wait-for-as-server-to-start composite action now fails if we cannot confirm that the server is ready to use for testing within 30 seconds

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.09%. Comparing base (c76bc84) to head (372881c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #699   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.09%   81.09%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines       15203    15203           
=======================================
  Hits        12329    12329           
  Misses       2874     2874           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 changed the title [CLIENT-3186] CI/CD: Use entrypoint script for image post-build steps instead of the run-ee-server composite action [CLIENT-3186] CI/CD: Use entrypoint script to finish setting up strong consistency instead of the run-ee-server composite action Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants