Skip to content

activeadmin vulnerable to stored persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) in dynamic form legends

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 31, 2024 in activeadmin/activeadmin • Updated Oct 28, 2024

Package

bundler activeadmin (RubyGems)

Affected versions

< 3.2.2
>= 4.0.0.beta1, < 4.0.0.beta7

Patched versions

3.2.2
4.0.0.beta7

Description

Impact

Users settings their active admin form legends dynamically may be vulnerable to stored XSS, as long as its value can be injected directly by a malicious user.

For example:

  • A public web application allows users to create entities with arbitrary names.
  • Active Admin is used to administrate these entities through a private backend.
  • The form to edit these entities in the private backend has the following shape (note the dynamic name value dependent on an attribute of the resource):
  form do |f|
    f.inputs name: resource.name do
      f.input :name
      f.input :description
    end

    f.actions
  end

Then a malicious user could create an entity with a payload that would get executed in the active admin administrator's browser.

Both form blocks with an implicit or explicit name (i.e., both form resource.name or form name: resource.name would suffer from the problem), where the value of the name can be arbitrarily set by non admin users.

Patches

The problem has been fixed in ActiveAdmin 3.2.2 and ActiveAdmin 4.0.0.beta7.

Workarounds

Users can workaround this problem without upgrading by explicitly escaping the form name using an HTML escaping utility. For example:

  form do |f|
    f.inputs name: ERB::Util.html_escape(resource.name) do
      f.input :name
      f.input :description
    end

    f.actions
  end

Upgrading is of course recommended though.

References

https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/xss/#stored-xss-attacks

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 2, 2024
Reviewed Jun 2, 2024
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jun 3, 2024
Last updated Oct 28, 2024

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2024-37031

GHSA ID

GHSA-9mg6-x45v-hcfm

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.