Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FORMS-8058] implement review component #1468

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

amit-mnnit
Copy link
Contributor

add css for now

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes and the overall coverage did not decrease.
  • All unit tests pass on CircleCi.
  • I ran all tests locally and they pass.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.44444% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.43%. Comparing base (aeed3f4) to head (96aa9d5).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...nts/internal/servlets/ReviewDataSourceServlet.java 81.08% 0 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev    #1468      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     82.35%   82.43%   +0.08%     
- Complexity      928      945      +17     
============================================
  Files           103      105       +2     
  Lines          2380     2425      +45     
  Branches        323      332       +9     
============================================
+ Hits           1960     1999      +39     
  Misses          258      258              
- Partials        162      168       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

1 similar comment
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 92 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 93 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

if (resourceResolver != null) {
Resource componentInstance = resourceResolver.getResource(componentInstancePath);
Resource formInstance = ComponentUtils.getFormContainer(componentInstance);
FormContainer formContainer = formInstance.adaptTo(FormContainer.class);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

formInstance could be null, please add Null pointer check,

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

for (Base panel : panels) {
String name = panel != null ? panel.getName() : "";
String title = "";
if (panel != null) {
Copy link
Contributor

@barshat7 barshat7 Nov 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

put the entire code under panel != null check rather than duplicating, also how are we preventing the review component itself being listed in the linked panel dropdown?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

request.setAttribute(DataSource.class.getName(), actionTypeDataSource);
}

private List<? extends ComponentExporter> getPanels(FormComponent formContainer) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like this method doesn't just return Panels, it can return a field as well. The method name is misleading

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have we tested this with a composite component like TnC?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed, checked for all components

}

@Override
public @NotNull Map<String, Object> getProperties() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's not expose this in properties until we have a customer use-case to render review in headless implementation

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We use these properties at runtime (reviewview.js) to render and display the editModeButton or the linked panel

@JsonIgnore
@ValueMapValue(injectionStrategy = InjectionStrategy.OPTIONAL, name = "editAction")
@Nullable
private String editAction;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JsonIgnore should only be part of interface

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed

@JsonIgnore
@ValueMapValue(injectionStrategy = InjectionStrategy.OPTIONAL, name = "editAction")
@Nullable
private String editAction;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you mean by editAction ? Its not clear. IIUC, this property is to enable edit action on UI, shouldn't this be a boolean

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed

ResourceResolver resourceResolver = request.getResourceResolver();
String componentInstancePath = request.getRequestPathInfo().getSuffix();
List<Resource> resources = new ArrayList<>();
if (resourceResolver != null) {
Copy link
Collaborator

@rismehta rismehta Nov 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should change the implementation by using FormContainer#visit, like we do during form submission, that way the code would be more readable.

In the current implementation, we were walking twice which is not required.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We cannot use the FormContainer#visit method as it does not solve our use case. During the review, if a container has more than one child, we need to stop the iteration and return the children of that container(To create a list of panel).

*/
@ConsumerType
public interface Review extends Base {
String[] getLinkedPanels();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The interface should be of provider type

please add java doc to all the methods. What does String[] array mean, if it is qualified name, then please link the QN documentation in the java doc

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked for other components, We are using @ConsumerType not provider type.
Add Java doc, please check

/**
* Defines the {@code Review} Sling Model used for the {@code /apps/core/fd/components/form/review} component.
*
* @since com.adobe.cq.forms.core.components.models 2.1.0
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please bump the version in minor version in package-info and use the same version here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
/*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ Copyright 2023 Adobe
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2024

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

## BEM Description
```
BLOCK cmp-adaptiveform-review
ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__container
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this BEM is correct should __panel be inside __container.

Also why is __field a sibling of container, shouldn't it be a child ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check attached screenshots for batter understanding of BEM.
Screenshot 2024-11-14 at 12 21 49 PM

2. `./hideTitle` - if set to `true`, the label of this field will be hidden
3. `./name` - defines the name of the field, which will be submitted with the form data
3. `./linkedPanels` - defines linked panels for reviewing the panel. If no panel is linked, the component will review the entire form.
3. `./editAction` - defines the edit action for editing the fields, panels, field & panel, or none
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's rename editAction to ./editModeAction : Determines the action or behavior for entering "edit mode"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed

<jcr:root xmlns:jcr="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0" xmlns:nt="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0" xmlns:cq="http://www.day.com/jcr/cq/1.0"
jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"
jcr:title="Review"
fieldType="plain-text"/>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fieldType should be defaulted and it should not be mandatory for review. We should get rid of fieldType from JCR and add it in the interface directly as fallback like we have done for other components

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed

@amit-mnnit amit-mnnit force-pushed the review-FORMS-8058-v2 branch 5 times, most recently from 7c4dae9 to 13098cf Compare November 18, 2024 05:01
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 93 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 93 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

Copy link
Collaborator

@rismehta rismehta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added few more comments

/**
* Defines the {@code Review} Sling Model used for the {@code /apps/core/fd/components/form/review} component.
*
* @since com.adobe.cq.forms.core.components.models 5.9.5
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update version to 5.9.6

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

/**
* @return an array of linked panels to be reviewed on the review page. Each linked panel is the name of a panel that is linked to the
* review page.
* @since com.adobe.cq.forms.core.components.models.form 5.9.5
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

even this should be 5.9.6

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
/*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ Copyright 2023 Adobe
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should be 2024

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__container
ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__panel
MODIFIER cmp-adaptiveform-review__panel--repeatable
ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__label-containe
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be -container

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__label-containe
ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__label
ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__edit-button
ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__value
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please indent the BEM correctly, it is still incorrect

BLOCK cmp-adaptiveform-review
    ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__container
        ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__panel
            MODIFIER cmp-adaptiveform-review__panel--repeatable
                ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__label-container
                    ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__label
                    ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__edit-button
                ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__value
        ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__field
            ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__label
            ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__value
            ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__edit-button
        ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__text
            ELEMENT cmp-adaptiveform-review__label

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

if (formInstance != null) {
FormContainer formContainer = formInstance.adaptTo(FormContainer.class);
List<Base> panelList = (List<Base>) getMultipleChildPanels(formContainer);
List<Base> panels = panelList.stream().filter(x -> "panel".equals(x.getFieldType())).collect(Collectors.toList());
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we please re-use the existing constant or create a new constant if not present

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


static addClassModifier(element, item) {
if(item.fieldType !== 'panel'){
element.querySelector('div').classList.add(Review.bemBlock + `__field--${item.fieldType}`);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's not have any hardcoded strings in the code, please create constants in the top and re-use the constant. That way code is more readable and easy to maintain

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

}

static addClassModifier(element, item) {
if(item.fieldType !== 'panel'){
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please create constant for this as well. In fact, we should have fieldType constants in a common place and re-use them across

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

static bemBlock = 'cmp-adaptiveform-review';
static templateAttribute = 'data-cmp-review';
static DATA_ATTRIBUTE_VISIBLE = 'data-cmp-visible';
static hideFieldFromReview = ['button', 'plain-text', 'captcha', 'image'];
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please expose them from af-core inside ui.frontend module. Core component should not own these constants

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

const templates = this.getTemplates();
let mappings = {};
templates.forEach(template => {
const type = template.getAttribute(Review.templateAttribute + '-fieldType');
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please have constant for this in this file

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 91 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants