Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Show Popup property under custom property #1437

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

pavi41
Copy link
Contributor

@pavi41 pavi41 commented Oct 8, 2024

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes and the overall coverage did not decrease.
  • All unit tests pass on CircleCi.
  • I ran all tests locally and they pass.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.27%. Comparing base (34aae8b) to head (d288a5b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                dev    #1437   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     82.27%   82.27%           
  Complexity      923      923           
=========================================
  Files           103      103           
  Lines          2369     2370    +1     
  Branches        321      321           
=========================================
+ Hits           1949     1950    +1     
  Misses          257      257           
  Partials        163      163           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 94 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
"showApprovalOption": true,
"jcr:title": "Terms And Conditions",
"fd:tnc": true,
"showAsPopup": true,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is backward incompatible change, for now, let's keep the property in content structure change (ie) showAsPopup so that existing form continue to work

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link
Collaborator

@rismehta rismehta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

check comments

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 95 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 94 96 96 75

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
"dorExcludeDescription": false
},
"fd:path": "/content/termsandconditionsNoWrapData",
"fd:tnc": true
"fd:tnc": true,
"showAsPopup": true
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The exported key should have the fd: prefix. My previous comment referred to the property saved in JCR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants