-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
artifact(download): skip non-zip files #1874
Open
crazy-max
wants to merge
1
commit into
actions:main
Choose a base branch
from
crazy-max:test-skip-non-zip
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+80
−14
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If a user requests a specific artifact to download and that artifact can't be downloaded, why should that silently fail?
Shouldn't that be an error?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm reluctant to change the default behavior here as it could be a breaking change for users.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
iiuc the API only expects zip content type for extraction when used with
actions/download-artifact@v4
:toolkit/packages/artifact/src/internal/download/download-artifact.ts
Line 92 in bb2278e
And it currently breaks workflows when artifacts with other content-type are being downloaded.
I guess we could create an error type if content type does not match so
actions/download-artifact
can catch it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought silently skipping unrelated artifacts not uploaded with
actions/upload-artifact
would be best so it doesn't require any changes inactions/download-artifact
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be better to use
pattern
input to filter out any artifacts that are not created byupload-artifact
action in this case? (credit to @joshmgross for this suggestion as well!)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yacaovsnc
It is uploaded as
.dockerbuild
file: https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/actions/runs/12707375438/job/35422185205#step:6:22But azure blob storage or GitHub upload backend enforces
.zip
extension somehow when downloaded from Summary page: https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/actions/runs/12707375438/artifacts/2412083382I don't think that's reliable. Best is checking the content type imo.
Zip compression is less efficient and may result in larger files for the same data and uses a less efficient compression algorithm compared to gzip. Also zip does not handle Unix-specific metadata (e.g., permissions, ownership, symbolic links). But we could encapsulate our tarball within the zip file but that sounds hacky. Doing so would also break Docker Desktop users trying to import builds with an unknown format. I defer to @colinhemmings @thompson-shaun.
What's wrong with excluding artifacts that don't have the expected content-type during extraction? If someone else using the API to upload another content-type, people using
actions/download-artifact
would have the same issue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the issue is it blurs the line between a real exception and an "expected" exception? Consider the same scenario where a user uses API to upload, and uses download-artifact to verify the content. Everything could be working until someone accidentally modify the upload portion to point to a wrong file, with this change it will be hard for those users to catch the mistake?
pattern
exists to include and exclude files, and to me it fits the current situation and it could solve our issue without any code change? A exclude pattern of!**/*.dockerbuild
seems could do the job?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The API only expects zip content type for extraction when used with
actions/download-artifact@v4
:toolkit/packages/artifact/src/internal/download/download-artifact.ts
Line 92 in bb2278e
So I'm not sure why this would be expected. I think this is an oversight in the implementation to skip unsupported content-types.
So what you mean is having this pattern set as default in
actions/download-artifact
?: https://github.com/actions/download-artifact/blob/533298bc57c27f112a2c04a74a04a4d43e2866fd/action.yml#L11-L13If in the future we change the filename it would break people using
actions/download-artifact
. The problem arises fromactions/download-artifact
downloading all artifacts if no name/pattern is defined.Maybe I miss something but I think it needs code changes in your toolkit or in
actions/download-artifact
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, customers must manually update their workflow to specify the exclusion pattern. We need to provide guidance on how to properly configure the download step to skip over docker produced artifacts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect the disagreement here is fundamentally - "should the 1st party artifact actions be compatible with artifacts created by other actions?"
The current implementation says no - thus users should avoid downloading artifacts that weren't uploaded by
actions/upload-artifact
.The behavior change to skip non-zip files does not make them compatible, but it would at least avoid some friction due to incompatibility.
I'm still not convinced skipping these downloads is the right approach though - changing an explicit failure to a silent one could surprise users and increase friction.