Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean-up database scan type #1139

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maximemulder
Copy link
Contributor

@maximemulder maximemulder commented Jun 26, 2024

Complementary PR of LORIS #9304

@maximemulder maximemulder changed the title Improve database scan type Clean-up database scan type Jun 26, 2024
@maximemulder
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am having some troubles testing this PR because my dev database config got changed recently, but this should work. According to the files changed, only the DICOM to MINC ingestion pipeline needs to be tested.

@maximemulder maximemulder marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2024 18:05
@cmadjar
Copy link
Collaborator

cmadjar commented Aug 1, 2024

@maximemulder there is a conflict in this PR. Could you rebase and let @nicolasbrossard and I when it is ready to test/review?

Thank you :)

@maximemulder maximemulder marked this pull request as draft September 13, 2024 14:39
@maximemulder maximemulder force-pushed the improve-database-scan-type branch 3 times, most recently from 22a00c3 to 5e8b460 Compare September 20, 2024 17:06
@maximemulder maximemulder marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2024 16:32
@cmadjar cmadjar added this to the 27.0 milestone Oct 4, 2024
@maximemulder maximemulder added the S-Large Size: Large. Pull requests that are large or complex and require a thorough review label Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Caveat for Existing Projects Refactoring S-Large Size: Large. Pull requests that are large or complex and require a thorough review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants