-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement “previously attached” part of CHA-RL4b1 #104
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lawrence-forooghian has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (1)
Line range hint
975-1011
: Consider refactoring duplicated code in test methodsThe test methods
contributorAttachEvent_withResumeFalse_withOperationInProgress_withContributorAttachedPreviously_recordsPendingDiscontinuityEvent
andcontributorAttachEvent_withResumeFalse_withOperationInProgress_withContributorNotAttachedPreviously_doesNotRecordPendingDiscontinuityEvent
share similar setup and teardown code. To improve maintainability and adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, consider extracting common code into helper functions or setup methods.Also applies to: 1015-1037
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift
(4 hunks)Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (2)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-18T18:34:37.252Z
Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z
Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.
Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (6)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:627-631
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z
Learning: The closure `detachImpl` in `RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift` functions as intended without external state variables to track invocation count.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:627-631
Timestamp: 2024-10-01T12:55:21.968Z
Learning: The closure `detachImpl` in `RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift` functions as intended without external state variables to track invocation count.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:335-335
Timestamp: 2024-09-23T19:56:39.435Z
Learning: In Swift Testing, test method names do not need to start with `test`.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-18T18:34:37.252Z
Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z
Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:335-335
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z
Learning: In Swift Testing, test method names do not need to start with `test`.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (5)
221-222
: LGTM: Well-documented property addition.
The hasBeenAttached
property is appropriately documented with a clear reference to the specification (CHA-RL1f).
241-242
: LGTM: Proper initialization of new property.
The hasBeenAttached
property is correctly initialized to false
, which is the appropriate default state for new contributors.
Line range hint 381-392
: LGTM: Correctly implements CHA-RL4b1 specification.
The implementation properly handles the "previously attached" case by checking both the resumed
flag and hasBeenAttached
state before recording a pending discontinuity event. This aligns with the PR objectives and fixes the potential crash during integration tests.
656-656
: LGTM: Proper state update after successful attach.
The hasBeenAttached
flag is correctly set to true
after a successful attach operation, ensuring accurate state tracking.
Line range hint 381-392
: Verify implementation matches specification requirements.
The implementation appears to correctly address the requirements, but let's verify the behavior matches the specification exactly.
Also applies to: 656-656
✅ Verification successful
Implementation correctly handles CHA-RL4b1 specification requirements
The implementation correctly handles the CHA-RL4b1 specification requirements by:
- Checking for non-resumed ATTACHED state changes during operations
- Verifying previous attachment state via
hasBeenAttached
flag - Recording discontinuity events when appropriate
- Properly handling error cases with precondition checks
The code follows the specification exactly and includes appropriate logging for debugging purposes. No issues were found in the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation matches CHA-RL4b1 specification requirements
# Test: Search for any other places where hasBeenAttached might need to be considered
rg -l "hasBeenAttached" --type swift
# Test: Search for any related test cases
rg -l "testPreviouslyAttached|testFirstAttach" --type swift
Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation more thoroughly
# Check the content of RoomLifecycleManager.swift to understand the full context
cat Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift
# Search for test files related to RoomLifecycleManager
fd "RoomLifecycleManager.*Test.*\.swift$"
# Search for any specification or documentation files
fd -e md | xargs rg -l "CHA-RL4b1"
Length of output: 46912
d320404
to
628b85a
Compare
Based on [1] at d9af7bf. I’m assuming that the “no call” in this spec point is a typo and means “a call”; have asked in [2]. Needed for when we integrate the room lifecycle manager into the rest of the SDK in #47 (else there will be a crash when running the integration tests, because a channel’s first ATTACHED status change has resumed == false and our precondition will fail). [1] ably/specification#200 [2] ably/specification#200 (comment)
279ae93
to
a1703dc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👌
Based on ably/specification#200 at
d9af7bf
. I’m assuming that the “no call” in this spec point is a typo and means “a call”; have asked in ably/specification#200 (comment).Needed for when we integrate the room lifecycle manager into the rest of the SDK in #47 (else there will be a crash when running the integration tests, because a channel’s first
ATTACHED
status change hasresumed == false
and our precondition will fail).Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests