Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Large Runners in Build Jobs #142
Use Large Runners in Build Jobs #142
Changes from all commits
452b335
0c2ac79
0eae6a2
859beb9
58677b6
7e45406
ba719b5
c91cdbf
097582c
fd46aa5
3e22f46
126751b
0dd45fa
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pdewilde - will it randomly choose one? I created the group because that's the only way to restrict the runners to a specific repo. I was thinking you would use either the 4-core or 8-core machine label directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aah, I assumed you intended for me to use the group for some reason (maybe so a slow job on the 8-core machine doesn't block all CI-jobs in the beefy group). I'm not sure what the logic is. I did one test and saw it corresponded to the 8-core machine and was hoping it would use the more powerful machine first.
I'll have to take a look and see if it seems to be consistently using the 8-core machine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actions/runner#1665
Looks like there is a long-existing ask but not movement on such a prioritization feature in a year. (That is for Self-Hosted rather than Large runners, but I would imagine the behavior is similar).
Probably best to just slap on the 8-core machine label directly. Probably no need to have a 4-core for now in the Beefy group as most of the other jobs run in pretty similar times.