Site Editor: Have useNavigateToPreviousEntityRecord rely on location state
#69103
+16
−21
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Size Change: +48 B (0%) Total Size: 1.84 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
stokesman
added
[Type] Bug
|
Flaky tests detected in f98383c. 🔍 Workflow run URL: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/actions/runs/13299207343
|
stokesman
commented
Feb 8, 2025
Comment on lines
+6
to
+7
| import type { ReactNode } from 'react'; | ||
| import type { Location } from 'history'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Moved 'react' import up from below
- Added
Locationtype import—Locationwas referenced before but since it wasn’t imported it was resolving to Typescript’s lib-dom which is different.
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message. To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
6 tasks
stokesman
force-pushed
the
fix/edit-site-back-button
branch
from
b4f408c to
564608d
Compare
stokesman
force-pushed
the
fix/edit-site-back-button
branch
from
564608d to
f98383c
Compare
This was referenced Feb 13, 2025
stokesman
added
[Type] Code Quality
|
Thanks for the PR! I believe there have been multiple PRs submitted regarding the context provider and router in the site editor:
And I found this comment in #68907:
Considering that, would it be best to close #68907 and move forward with #69103 and #69172? @youknowriad @jsnajdr Also, I'd love to hear any feedback if you have on moving state into the router and removing the context providers from the site editor sidebar. |
|
Can we move this PR forward? If all related PRs are resolved, including this one, I think the redundant nesting of elements will be resolved, especially in mobile layouts. I think that will make it easier to resolve #69156. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Makes the code concerned with whether to show a back button more robust.
Originally made to fix #69016.
Why?
Code quality. Currently the
useNavigateToPreviousEntityRecordhook relies on theusePrevioushook to keep some state locally. This, as seen in #69016, can fail if the consuming component remounts. While remounts are best avoided and unlikely to return in this case, the changes here make it impervious to remounts. Besides that, there are more reasons to avoid using theusePrevioushook:How?
useNavigateToEntityRecordto store the state that was kept byusePreviousin the the router’slocation.statelocation.statethrough theuseLocationhooknavigateToPreviousEntityRecordto use the new state from the routerTesting Instructions