ci: add JDK 17 and Ubuntu 22.04 support

[bradh]

Motivation and Context

JDK 14 is out-of-life, and JDK 17 is the current LTS.

Also, #403 reports a problem with JDK 14. That might be a broader issue, but can be investigated better if we have a more recent JDK in the CI mix.

Description

Add JDK 17 CI workflow. JDK 14 remains for the purposes of debugging, so this is considered to relate to #403, but not resolve it yet.

How Has This Been Tested?

Only testing as part of the CI for this PR.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

• My code follows the code style of this project.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• All new and existing tests passed.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #405 (8a52d00) into 2.x (ed8cf4e) will increase coverage by 1.77%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x     #405      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     91.06%   92.84%   +1.77%     
- Complexity     5608     5671      +63     
============================================
  Files           609      609              
  Lines         14568    14568              
  Branches       1379     1379              
============================================
+ Hits          13266    13525     +259     
+ Misses         1267      965     -302     
- Partials         35       78      +43     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-api	98.98% <ø> (ø)
unittests-api-ffmpeg	34.18% <ø> (+18.32%)	⬆️
unittests-awt	100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-core	98.44% <ø> (ø)
unittests-geoid	100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-mimd	97.24% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st0601	99.01% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st0602	99.06% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st0805	99.17% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st0808	99.08% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st0809	99.11% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st1108	99.66% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st1206	99.59% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st1301	98.91% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st1403	100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st1601	100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st1602	100.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st1603	98.03% <ø> (ø)
unittests-st1909	99.65% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...src/main/java/org/jmisb/api/video/FfmpegUtils.java	14.89% <0.00%> (+4.25%)	⬆️
...main/java/org/jmisb/api/video/VideoFileOutput.java	41.66% <0.00%> (+41.66%)	⬆️
...src/main/java/org/jmisb/api/video/VideoOutput.java	51.83% <0.00%> (+51.83%)	⬆️
...g/src/main/java/org/jmisb/api/video/FfmpegLog.java	64.70% <0.00%> (+52.94%)	⬆️
...ain/java/org/jmisb/api/video/OutputStatistics.java	54.54% <0.00%> (+54.54%)	⬆️
...in/java/org/jmisb/api/video/VideoStreamOutput.java	63.15% <0.00%> (+63.15%)	⬆️
.../src/main/java/org/jmisb/api/video/CodecUtils.java	95.83% <0.00%> (+95.83%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ed8cf4e...8a52d00. Read the comment docs.