-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(app): refactor #62
Conversation
- move login js to js resources - rename postLogin to login (POST) - rename PostLoginRequest to LoginRequest - rename asset name (using laravel ext autocomplete) - remove unused routes
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the authentication flow in a Laravel application. The modifications primarily involve renaming methods and routes related to login functionality, updating the request handling class, and adjusting the frontend JavaScript and view files. The changes aim to standardize the naming conventions for login-related components and simplify the form submission process. The project also removes some event-related functionality and updates the authentication template to allow for more flexible script inclusion. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant LoginForm
participant AuthController
participant LoginRequest
User->>LoginForm: Fills login credentials
User->>LoginForm: Submits form
LoginForm->>AuthController: POST /login
AuthController->>LoginRequest: Validate request
LoginRequest-->>AuthController: Validation result
alt Validation successful
AuthController->>User: Redirect to dashboard
else Validation failed
AuthController->>LoginForm: Show validation errors
end
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
resources/js/pages/login.js (1)
1-5
: Consider enhancing the form submission handler.While the loading state handling is good, consider these improvements:
- Add error handling to reset the loading state if the form submission fails.
- Add client-side form validation before submission.
- Add comments explaining the purpose of each DOM element for better maintainability.
Apply this diff to enhance the form submission handler:
$(document).on("submit", "#form-login", function (e) { + // Show loading state $("#loading_submit").removeClass("hide"); $("#text_submit").addClass("hide"); $("#btn_submit").addClass("isLoading").attr("disabled", "disabled"); + + // Add error handling + $(this).on("ajaxError", function(event, jqXHR) { + // Reset loading state + $("#loading_submit").addClass("hide"); + $("#text_submit").removeClass("hide"); + $("#btn_submit").removeClass("isLoading").removeAttr("disabled"); + + // Handle error response + if (jqXHR.status === 422) { + CustomHelper.errorHandlerForm(jqXHR); + } + }); + + // Add form validation + if (!this.checkValidity()) { + e.preventDefault(); + e.stopPropagation(); + $(this).addClass("was-validated"); + return false; + } });app/Http/Controllers/AuthController.php (1)
63-64
: Consider enhancing error handling in resetPassword.The error handling could be more specific by providing detailed error messages for different failure scenarios.
Apply this diff to enhance error handling:
- ? redirect()->route('login.index')->with('status', __($status)) - : back()->withErrors(['email' => [__($status)]]); + ? redirect()->route('login.index')->with('status', __($status)) + : back()->withErrors([ + 'email' => match ($status) { + Password::INVALID_TOKEN => 'The password reset token is invalid.', + Password::INVALID_USER => 'We could not find a user with that email address.', + Password::RESET_THROTTLED => 'Please wait before retrying.', + default => __($status) + } + ]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
app/Http/Controllers/AuthController.php
(3 hunks)app/Http/Requests/LoginRequest.php
(1 hunks)resources/js/bootstrap.js
(1 hunks)resources/js/pages/login.js
(1 hunks)resources/views/auth/login.blade.php
(4 hunks)resources/views/template/auth.blade.php
(1 hunks)routes/web.php
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/Http/Requests/LoginRequest.php
🔇 Additional comments (6)
resources/views/template/auth.blade.php (1)
19-19
: LGTM!Good addition of the
@yield('scripts')
directive to allow child views to include page-specific scripts.app/Http/Controllers/AuthController.php (1)
Line range hint
17-26
: LGTM!The login method follows Laravel's conventions and includes activity logging.
resources/js/bootstrap.js (1)
83-83
: LGTM!Good addition of the login page module import, maintaining the modular architecture.
routes/web.php (1)
86-87
: LGTM! Route changes follow RESTful conventions.The changes improve the route naming by following Laravel's resource naming convention and RESTful practices.
Let's verify that all references to these routes have been updated:
resources/views/auth/login.blade.php (2)
43-43
: LGTM! Form changes align with route updates.The form action and ID changes are consistent with the route updates and follow naming conventions.
48-50
: LGTM! Form fields follow Laravel best practices.The input fields properly handle validation, preserve old values, and use appropriate attributes.
Also applies to: 60-61
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
resources/views/auth/login.blade.php
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
resources/views/auth/login.blade.php (2)
43-43
: LGTM! Form changes follow best practices.The changes improve the code by:
- Using RESTful endpoint naming
- Separating JavaScript event handling
- Following separation of concerns
48-50
: LGTM! Improved code formatting.The indentation changes enhance code readability while maintaining functionality.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores