You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think any one alignment tool like BWA ,Bowtie etc gives us sufficient details about alignment of exome sample to reference genome but I am getting why multiple tools are used here because it will be then more computationally complex. Will it give better alignment score of resultant file. Have you merged all the SAM files obtained after difference alignment tool operation? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Yes, you are right. Each aligner by itself is pretty good, however, variants called on alignments by different aligners may differ a lot (see SeqMule paper). Thanks.
On Mar 9, 2018, at 1:20 AM, vivekruhela ***@***.***> wrote:
I think any one alignment tool like BWA ,Bowtie etc gives us sufficient details about alignment of exome sample to reference genome but I am getting why multiple tools are used here because it will be then more computationally complex. Will it give better alignment score of resultant file. Have you merged all the SAM files obtained after difference alignment tool operation? Thanks.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#170>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHYPztXDxHA_Uxtg_aiPS-WJXuEWU_bpks5tcklqgaJpZM4Sj-QD>.
I think any one alignment tool like BWA ,Bowtie etc gives us sufficient details about alignment of exome sample to reference genome but I am getting why multiple tools are used here because it will be then more computationally complex. Will it give better alignment score of resultant file. Have you merged all the SAM files obtained after difference alignment tool operation? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: