Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix mpf numbers #22

Closed

Conversation

arthurkehrwald
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes issue #21 by introducing a new serializable class called MpfNameNumberDictionary that permanently stores the number of each switch, coil, and light defined in the MPF machine description when it is transferred during initial setup. At runtime, this class is used to look up the numbers necessary to communicate with MPF.

@freezy
Copy link
Member

freezy commented Jul 17, 2024

Hey man, thanks a lot but I'm currently on holidays so I'll go through everything when I'm back in 10 days!

@arthurkehrwald
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @freezy , have you taken a look at any of my PRs yet?

@freezy
Copy link
Member

freezy commented Aug 16, 2024

Not yet, but it's the next thing on my list. Currently working on Serum v2 :)

@freezy
Copy link
Member

freezy commented Sep 8, 2024

Would you mind rebasing this?

@arthurkehrwald
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm a bit shaky with git. Not really sure if this is what you wanted xD

@arthurkehrwald arthurkehrwald reopened this Sep 9, 2024
@arthurkehrwald
Copy link
Contributor Author

@freezy Want to merge?

@freezy
Copy link
Member

freezy commented Nov 12, 2024

Yes, can you give me write access to this one as well?

@arthurkehrwald
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will do

@freezy
Copy link
Member

freezy commented Nov 12, 2024

Thanks!

I'm not using MPF in any project right now (as you might have noticed!), so I'm just going to rebase your PRs and get them back upstream, if that's okay with you.

@freezy
Copy link
Member

freezy commented Nov 12, 2024

This PR actually doesn't compile:

image

Is this fixed in later PRs?

@arthurkehrwald arthurkehrwald mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2024
@arthurkehrwald
Copy link
Contributor Author

I messed up the rebase really badly. I just tested the master branch of my fork and that compiles and works. If you want to save some time, we can just merge that and be done with it. If not, use this new PR #33 instead. I've cherry picked the needed commit.

@freezy
Copy link
Member

freezy commented Nov 12, 2024

Yes, I might do that. Still testing the bumper changes..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants