forked from chyanju/Picus
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release: sync with internal Picus #66
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Setup pre-release files * Setup release files --------- Co-authored-by: sorawee <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: shankarapailoor <[email protected]>
Prior this commit, yvec will reuse input variables from xvec which is sound because we assume that they are equal anyway. However, this reusing adds complexity to Picus. This commit removes the reusing, simplifying the codebase. The removal should also not affect performance, since SMT solvers are very good at dealing with equalities. This also allows modular verification to be programmed more straightforwardly.
…eridise#22) Previously, we added them during a constraint optimization pass as a part of the AST traversal. This is not ideal for many reasons. First, we only want to include the definitons once, but the AST traversal opens an opportunity to accidentally include them more than once (e.g. if we happen to have a rcmds as a subnode of another node). Second, it meant that we needed the pdef? parameter so that on alternative constraints, the prime definitions are omitted. The refactoring simply put the definition inclusion at the top-level, simplifying the optimization pass.
* chore: clean up indentation * logging: log inferred known vars
See the changelog for details
0b484bd
to
0ff3926
Compare
0ff3926
to
ace287f
Compare
shankarapailoor
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.