Exclude gnu.org and fsf.org from link checker #454
Conversation
Propose to exclude it as this is not the first time we've encountered this.
samcunliffe
changed the title
| # necessarily not real links - i.e. demos and to be filled by | ||
| # cookiecutter values. | ||
| args: | ||
| "--verbose --exclude https://forum.image.sc/ --exclude docs/pages | ||
| "--verbose --exclude https://forum.image.sc/ --exclude http://www.gnu.org --exclude http://fsf.org --exclude docs/pages |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "--verbose --exclude https://forum.image.sc/ --exclude http://www.gnu.org --exclude http://fsf.org --exclude docs/pages | |
| "--verbose --exclude https://forum.image.sc/ --exclude | |
| http://www.gnu.org --exclude http://fsf.org --exclude docs/pages |
|
@samcunliffe stop automerging like that! Otherwise, what is the point in reviewing? |
🤖 the automerge robot and our linters are happy with my linebreaks. |
That's because you wouldn't allow https://prettier.io/docs/en/options.html#prose-wrap |
|
Did I? That doesn't sound like a think I would block... We had it in |
Ha! Found it. @paddyroddy, I'm sorry to report that it was you that removed that: |
I'm fully aware, it was due to your markdown linking |
The link checker is timing out at gnu.org and fsf.org. Propose to exclude as this is not the first time we've encountered this. And we can't remove the links: it's part of the licenses.
Would unblock @renovate bot's many updates.